TY - JOUR
T1 - A deep convolutional neural network-based automatic detection of brain metastases with and without blood vessel suppression
AU - Kikuchi, Yoshitomo
AU - Togao, Osamu
AU - Kikuchi, Kazufumi
AU - Momosaka, Daichi
AU - Obara, Makoto
AU - Van Cauteren, Marc
AU - Fischer, Alexander
AU - Ishigami, Kousei
AU - Akio, Hiwatashi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K07645.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Objectives: To develop an automated model to detect brain metastases using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and volume isotropic simultaneous interleaved bright-blood and black-blood examination (VISIBLE) and to compare its diagnostic performance with the observer test. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with clinical suspicion of brain metastases imaged with VISIBLE from March 2016 to July 2019 to create a model. Images with and without blood vessel suppression were used for training an existing CNN (DeepMedic). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false-positive results per case (FPs/case). We compared the diagnostic performance of the CNN model with that of the twelve radiologists. Results: Fifty patients (30 males and 20 females; age range 29–86 years; mean 63.3 ± 12.8 years; a total of 165 metastases) who were clinically diagnosed with brain metastasis on follow-up were used for the training. The sensitivity of our model was 91.7%, which was higher than that of the observer test (mean ± standard deviation; 88.7 ± 3.7%). The number of FPs/case in our model was 1.5, which was greater than that by the observer test (0.17 ± 0.09). Conclusions: Compared to radiologists, our model created by VISIBLE and CNN to diagnose brain metastases showed higher sensitivity. The number of FPs/case by our model was greater than that by the observer test of radiologists; however, it was less than that in most of the previous studies with deep learning. Key Points: • Our convolutional neural network based on bright-blood and black-blood examination to diagnose brain metastases showed a higher sensitivity than that by the observer test. • The number of false-positives/case by our model was greater than that by the previous observer test; however, it was less than those from most previous studies. • In our model, false-positives were found in the vessels, choroid plexus, and image noise or unknown causes.
AB - Objectives: To develop an automated model to detect brain metastases using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and volume isotropic simultaneous interleaved bright-blood and black-blood examination (VISIBLE) and to compare its diagnostic performance with the observer test. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with clinical suspicion of brain metastases imaged with VISIBLE from March 2016 to July 2019 to create a model. Images with and without blood vessel suppression were used for training an existing CNN (DeepMedic). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false-positive results per case (FPs/case). We compared the diagnostic performance of the CNN model with that of the twelve radiologists. Results: Fifty patients (30 males and 20 females; age range 29–86 years; mean 63.3 ± 12.8 years; a total of 165 metastases) who were clinically diagnosed with brain metastasis on follow-up were used for the training. The sensitivity of our model was 91.7%, which was higher than that of the observer test (mean ± standard deviation; 88.7 ± 3.7%). The number of FPs/case in our model was 1.5, which was greater than that by the observer test (0.17 ± 0.09). Conclusions: Compared to radiologists, our model created by VISIBLE and CNN to diagnose brain metastases showed higher sensitivity. The number of FPs/case by our model was greater than that by the observer test of radiologists; however, it was less than that in most of the previous studies with deep learning. Key Points: • Our convolutional neural network based on bright-blood and black-blood examination to diagnose brain metastases showed a higher sensitivity than that by the observer test. • The number of false-positives/case by our model was greater than that by the previous observer test; however, it was less than those from most previous studies. • In our model, false-positives were found in the vessels, choroid plexus, and image noise or unknown causes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122471126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122471126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-021-08427-2
DO - 10.1007/s00330-021-08427-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122471126
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 32
SP - 2998
EP - 3005
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 5
ER -