TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel single-stapling technique for colorectal anastomosis
T2 - a pre-ligation single-stapling technique (L-SST) in a porcine model
AU - Takeyama, Hiroshi
AU - Yamamoto, Hirofumi
AU - Hata, Taishi
AU - Takahashi, Yusuke
AU - Ohtsuka, Masahisa
AU - Nonaka, Ryoji
AU - Inoue, Akira
AU - Naito, Atsushi
AU - Matsumura, Tae
AU - Uemura, Mamoru
AU - Nishimura, Junichi
AU - Takemasa, Ichiro
AU - Mizushima, Tsunekazu
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Mori, Masaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/8/25
Y1 - 2015/8/25
N2 - Background: In low anterior resections, anastomosis continues to present major problems. Although the single-stapling technique (SST) is considered to be superior to the double-staple technique (DST) in terms of leakage and stenosis, SST requires suturing, which is particularly difficult during laparoscopic surgery. A simpler and safer method of anastomosis is needed. In this study, we developed a pre-ligation SST (L-SST) that does not require suturing and evaluated the usefulness of L-SST in an ex vivo and an in vivo porcine model. Methods: Porcine rectums were ligated using SurgiTie™ and sharply resected instead of using a linear stapler. The burst pressures of the closed rectums after using a linear stapler and SurgiTie™ (each group; n = 5) and the burst pressures of the anastomoses performed with L-SST and DST (each group; n = 4) were measured. During in vivo porcine laparoscopic surgery, we performed and evaluated the feasibility of L-SST. Results: After completing the anastomosis with L-SST, the ligated portion using SurgiTie™ was completely removed. The stump closed using SurgiTie™ was much stronger than that closed using a stapler (131.2 and 25.6 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.01). The average burst pressure of the anastomoses performed with L-SST was 33.8 mmHg, whereas that performed with DST was 30.5 mmHg. We did not find significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.88). We also confirmed the feasibility of L-SST in an in vivo porcine laparoscopic surgery model. Conclusion: We developed a novel SST, the L-SST. We were able to perform L-SST successfully using an ex vivo porcine rectum and during in vivo porcine laparoscopic surgery.
AB - Background: In low anterior resections, anastomosis continues to present major problems. Although the single-stapling technique (SST) is considered to be superior to the double-staple technique (DST) in terms of leakage and stenosis, SST requires suturing, which is particularly difficult during laparoscopic surgery. A simpler and safer method of anastomosis is needed. In this study, we developed a pre-ligation SST (L-SST) that does not require suturing and evaluated the usefulness of L-SST in an ex vivo and an in vivo porcine model. Methods: Porcine rectums were ligated using SurgiTie™ and sharply resected instead of using a linear stapler. The burst pressures of the closed rectums after using a linear stapler and SurgiTie™ (each group; n = 5) and the burst pressures of the anastomoses performed with L-SST and DST (each group; n = 4) were measured. During in vivo porcine laparoscopic surgery, we performed and evaluated the feasibility of L-SST. Results: After completing the anastomosis with L-SST, the ligated portion using SurgiTie™ was completely removed. The stump closed using SurgiTie™ was much stronger than that closed using a stapler (131.2 and 25.6 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.01). The average burst pressure of the anastomoses performed with L-SST was 33.8 mmHg, whereas that performed with DST was 30.5 mmHg. We did not find significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.88). We also confirmed the feasibility of L-SST in an in vivo porcine laparoscopic surgery model. Conclusion: We developed a novel SST, the L-SST. We were able to perform L-SST successfully using an ex vivo porcine rectum and during in vivo porcine laparoscopic surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937835763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937835763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-014-3960-5
DO - 10.1007/s00464-014-3960-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 25480605
AN - SCOPUS:84937835763
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 29
SP - 2371
EP - 2376
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 8
ER -