TY - JOUR
T1 - A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer with Arterial Involvement
AU - for the Kyushu Study Group of Treatment for Pancreatobiliary Cancer
AU - Ikenaga, Naoki
AU - Miyasaka, Yoshihiro
AU - Takao, Ohtsuka
AU - Nakata, Kohei
AU - Adachi, Tomohiko
AU - Eguchi, Susumu
AU - Nishihara, Kazuyoshi
AU - Inomata, Masafumi
AU - Kurahara, Hiroshi
AU - Hisaka, Toru
AU - Baba, Hideo
AU - Nagano, Hiroaki
AU - Ueki, Toshiharu
AU - Noshiro, Hirokazu
AU - Tokunaga, Shoji
AU - Ishigami, Kousei
AU - Nakamura, Masafumi
N1 - Funding Information:
Hideo Baba received honoraria, research funding, and scholarship donations from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., honoraria and research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and scholarship donations from Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd., ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORPORATION, Sanofi K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Johnson & Johnson K.K., and Eisai Co., Ltd. for matters not pertaining to this study. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article. No financial support was received for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Only two clinical trials have shown the effects of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial involvement (BRPC-A). Here, we aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for BRPC-A. Patients and Methods: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase II trial was conducted. Patients who were radiologically and histologically diagnosed with BRPC-A were enrolled. A central review was conducted to confirm the presence of BRPC-A. Patients received two to four cycles of GnP before surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the R0 resection rate. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated in an ancillary study. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 33 were subjected to central review and 28 were confirmed to have BRPC-A. All eligible patients with BRPC-A received neoadjuvant GnP. Nineteen patients underwent pancreatic resections. Postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo IIIa or lower were observed in 11 patients. No treatment-related mortalities were observed. R0 resection was achieved in 17 patients (89%); the R0 resection rate was 61% in eligible patients. One patient underwent curative resection after termination of the treatment protocol, resulting in an overall R0 resection rate of 64%. The median overall survival (OS) and 2-year OS rate were 24.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.0 months to not estimatable] and 53.6%, respectively. OS in patients with BRPC-A who achieved overall R0 resection was significantly longer than that in the other patients (p = 0.0255). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant GnP is a safe and effective strategy for BRPC-A, providing a chance for curative resection and improved survival.
AB - Background: Only two clinical trials have shown the effects of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial involvement (BRPC-A). Here, we aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for BRPC-A. Patients and Methods: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase II trial was conducted. Patients who were radiologically and histologically diagnosed with BRPC-A were enrolled. A central review was conducted to confirm the presence of BRPC-A. Patients received two to four cycles of GnP before surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the R0 resection rate. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated in an ancillary study. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 33 were subjected to central review and 28 were confirmed to have BRPC-A. All eligible patients with BRPC-A received neoadjuvant GnP. Nineteen patients underwent pancreatic resections. Postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo IIIa or lower were observed in 11 patients. No treatment-related mortalities were observed. R0 resection was achieved in 17 patients (89%); the R0 resection rate was 61% in eligible patients. One patient underwent curative resection after termination of the treatment protocol, resulting in an overall R0 resection rate of 64%. The median overall survival (OS) and 2-year OS rate were 24.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.0 months to not estimatable] and 53.6%, respectively. OS in patients with BRPC-A who achieved overall R0 resection was significantly longer than that in the other patients (p = 0.0255). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant GnP is a safe and effective strategy for BRPC-A, providing a chance for curative resection and improved survival.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138497758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138497758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-022-12566-1
DO - 10.1245/s10434-022-12566-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 36171527
AN - SCOPUS:85138497758
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
SN - 1068-9265
ER -