A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing

Yuki Yamada, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術誌査読

1 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

A continued lack of clarity persists because academics, policymakers, and other interested parties are unable to clearly define what is a “predatory” journal or publisher, and a potentially wide gray zone exists there. In this perspective, we argue that journals should be evaluated on a continuum, and not just in two shades, black and white. Since evaluations about what might constitute “predatory” are made by humans, the psychological decision-making system that determines them may induce biases. Considering such human psychological characteristics might shed light on the deterministic criteria that have been used, and continue to be used, to classify a journal or publisher as “predatory”, and perhaps, bring additional clarity to this discussion. Better methods of journal evaluation can be obtained when the factors that polarize journal evaluations are identified. As one example, we need to move away from simply using whitelists and blacklists and educate individual researchers about how to evaluate journals. This paper serves as an educational tool by providing more clarity about the “gray” publishing zone, and argues that currently available qualitative and quantitative systems should be fused to deterministically appreciate the zonation of white, gray and black journals, so as to possibly reduce or eliminate the influence of cognitive or “perception” bias from the “predatory” publishing debate.

本文言語英語
ジャーナルQuality and Quantity
DOI
出版ステータス印刷中 - 2022

!!!All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • 統計学および確率
  • 社会科学(全般)

フィンガープリント

「A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル