Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond

Stefan Wrbka, Steven J. Van Uytsel, Mathias M. Siems

研究成果: 著書/レポートタイプへの貢献

2 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Cases involving a large number of potential claimants have long presented difficulties to legal systems designed to accommodate disputes primarily among a small number of parties. Deterred by factors such as the costs of potential court proceedings and the imbalance of power between parties, private actors often abstain from pursuing their rights. Potential defendants who have caused significant but dispersed harm may thus escape from sanctions or liability. As a result, multiple layers of interests, or ‘multilayer interests’, ranging from the interests of private actors in protecting their rights on the one hand to the interests of society as a whole in deterring socially detrimental behaviour on the other, may be left unsatisfied. To remedy this problem, various forms of collective actions have been developed. They range from group actions, in which individual actions are assembled into one procedure; to representative actions, in which an association sues on behalf of a multitude of claimants; to test case procedures, in which claimants sue in order to set a precedent for others. These various forms of collective actions aim to facilitate ‘access to justice’ for private actors, that is, the ability to enforce and protect one's rights through a legal process. In addition to bundling a larger number of fragmented individual interests, they are seen as a mechanism to safeguard the common interests of specific groups of claimants and of society as a whole. Moreover, collective actions are not just a procedural tool but raise a number of political, social and economic issues, for instance, balancing of interests between weaker private actors and bigger players, coordination of collective actions with enforcement efforts by public agencies, cost issues and a possible subordination of the individual for the sake of larger or collective interests.

元の言語英語
ホスト出版物のタイトルCollective Actions
ホスト出版物のサブタイトルEnhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests?
出版者Cambridge University Press
ページ1-20
ページ数20
ISBN(電子版)9781139109383
ISBN(印刷物)9781107021549
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 1 1 2012

Fingerprint

Justice
Florence
Collective Action
Costs
Dispute
Legal System
Procedural
Sanctions
Economics
Layer
Proceedings
Liability
Enforcement
Subordination
Players
Harm

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

これを引用

Wrbka, S., Van Uytsel, S. J., & Siems, M. M. (2012). Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond. : Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests? (pp. 1-20). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139109383.002

Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond. / Wrbka, Stefan; Van Uytsel, Steven J.; Siems, Mathias M.

Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests?. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 1-20.

研究成果: 著書/レポートタイプへの貢献

Wrbka, S, Van Uytsel, SJ & Siems, MM 2012, Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond. : Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests?. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139109383.002
Wrbka S, Van Uytsel SJ, Siems MM. Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond. : Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests?. Cambridge University Press. 2012. p. 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139109383.002
Wrbka, Stefan ; Van Uytsel, Steven J. ; Siems, Mathias M. / Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond. Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests?. Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 1-20
@inbook{e95634c67d8d45c28bb7ecaa9a5b0dd5,
title = "Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond",
abstract = "Cases involving a large number of potential claimants have long presented difficulties to legal systems designed to accommodate disputes primarily among a small number of parties. Deterred by factors such as the costs of potential court proceedings and the imbalance of power between parties, private actors often abstain from pursuing their rights. Potential defendants who have caused significant but dispersed harm may thus escape from sanctions or liability. As a result, multiple layers of interests, or ‘multilayer interests’, ranging from the interests of private actors in protecting their rights on the one hand to the interests of society as a whole in deterring socially detrimental behaviour on the other, may be left unsatisfied. To remedy this problem, various forms of collective actions have been developed. They range from group actions, in which individual actions are assembled into one procedure; to representative actions, in which an association sues on behalf of a multitude of claimants; to test case procedures, in which claimants sue in order to set a precedent for others. These various forms of collective actions aim to facilitate ‘access to justice’ for private actors, that is, the ability to enforce and protect one's rights through a legal process. In addition to bundling a larger number of fragmented individual interests, they are seen as a mechanism to safeguard the common interests of specific groups of claimants and of society as a whole. Moreover, collective actions are not just a procedural tool but raise a number of political, social and economic issues, for instance, balancing of interests between weaker private actors and bigger players, coordination of collective actions with enforcement efforts by public agencies, cost issues and a possible subordination of the individual for the sake of larger or collective interests.",
author = "Stefan Wrbka and {Van Uytsel}, {Steven J.} and Siems, {Mathias M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139109383.002",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107021549",
pages = "1--20",
booktitle = "Collective Actions",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Access to justice and collective actions ‘Florence’ and beyond

AU - Wrbka, Stefan

AU - Van Uytsel, Steven J.

AU - Siems, Mathias M.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Cases involving a large number of potential claimants have long presented difficulties to legal systems designed to accommodate disputes primarily among a small number of parties. Deterred by factors such as the costs of potential court proceedings and the imbalance of power between parties, private actors often abstain from pursuing their rights. Potential defendants who have caused significant but dispersed harm may thus escape from sanctions or liability. As a result, multiple layers of interests, or ‘multilayer interests’, ranging from the interests of private actors in protecting their rights on the one hand to the interests of society as a whole in deterring socially detrimental behaviour on the other, may be left unsatisfied. To remedy this problem, various forms of collective actions have been developed. They range from group actions, in which individual actions are assembled into one procedure; to representative actions, in which an association sues on behalf of a multitude of claimants; to test case procedures, in which claimants sue in order to set a precedent for others. These various forms of collective actions aim to facilitate ‘access to justice’ for private actors, that is, the ability to enforce and protect one's rights through a legal process. In addition to bundling a larger number of fragmented individual interests, they are seen as a mechanism to safeguard the common interests of specific groups of claimants and of society as a whole. Moreover, collective actions are not just a procedural tool but raise a number of political, social and economic issues, for instance, balancing of interests between weaker private actors and bigger players, coordination of collective actions with enforcement efforts by public agencies, cost issues and a possible subordination of the individual for the sake of larger or collective interests.

AB - Cases involving a large number of potential claimants have long presented difficulties to legal systems designed to accommodate disputes primarily among a small number of parties. Deterred by factors such as the costs of potential court proceedings and the imbalance of power between parties, private actors often abstain from pursuing their rights. Potential defendants who have caused significant but dispersed harm may thus escape from sanctions or liability. As a result, multiple layers of interests, or ‘multilayer interests’, ranging from the interests of private actors in protecting their rights on the one hand to the interests of society as a whole in deterring socially detrimental behaviour on the other, may be left unsatisfied. To remedy this problem, various forms of collective actions have been developed. They range from group actions, in which individual actions are assembled into one procedure; to representative actions, in which an association sues on behalf of a multitude of claimants; to test case procedures, in which claimants sue in order to set a precedent for others. These various forms of collective actions aim to facilitate ‘access to justice’ for private actors, that is, the ability to enforce and protect one's rights through a legal process. In addition to bundling a larger number of fragmented individual interests, they are seen as a mechanism to safeguard the common interests of specific groups of claimants and of society as a whole. Moreover, collective actions are not just a procedural tool but raise a number of political, social and economic issues, for instance, balancing of interests between weaker private actors and bigger players, coordination of collective actions with enforcement efforts by public agencies, cost issues and a possible subordination of the individual for the sake of larger or collective interests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925612247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925612247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139109383.002

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139109383.002

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107021549

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - Collective Actions

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -