TY - JOUR
T1 - Applicability of the DPPH assay for evaluating the antioxidant capacity of food additives - inter-laboratory evaluation study
AU - Shimamura, Tomoko
AU - Sumikura, Yoshihiro
AU - Yamazaki, Takeshi
AU - Tada, Atsuko
AU - Kashiwagi, Takehiro
AU - Ishikawa, Hiroya
AU - Matsui, Toshiro
AU - Sugimoto, Naoki
AU - Akiyama, Hiroshi
AU - Ukeda, Hiroyuki
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - An inter-laboratory evaluation study was conducted in order to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of food additives by using a 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. Four antioxidants used as existing food additives (i.e., tea extract, grape seed extract, enju extract, and d-α-tocopherol) and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) were used as analytical samples, and 14 laboratories participated in this study. The repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) of the IC50 of Trolox, four antioxidants, and the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) were 1.8 - 2.2%, 2.2 - 2.9%, and 2.1 - 2.5%, respectively. Thus, the proposed DPPH assay showed good performance within the same laboratory. The reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) of IC50 of Trolox, four antioxidants, and TEAC were 4.0 - 7.9%, 6.0 - 11%, and 3.7 - 9.3%, respectively. The RSDR/RSDr values of TEAC were lower than, or nearly equal to, those of IC50 of the four antioxidants, suggesting that the use of TEAC was effective for reducing the variance among the laboratories. These results showed that the proposed DPPH assay could be used as a standard method to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of food additives.
AB - An inter-laboratory evaluation study was conducted in order to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of food additives by using a 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. Four antioxidants used as existing food additives (i.e., tea extract, grape seed extract, enju extract, and d-α-tocopherol) and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) were used as analytical samples, and 14 laboratories participated in this study. The repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) of the IC50 of Trolox, four antioxidants, and the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) were 1.8 - 2.2%, 2.2 - 2.9%, and 2.1 - 2.5%, respectively. Thus, the proposed DPPH assay showed good performance within the same laboratory. The reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) of IC50 of Trolox, four antioxidants, and TEAC were 4.0 - 7.9%, 6.0 - 11%, and 3.7 - 9.3%, respectively. The RSDR/RSDr values of TEAC were lower than, or nearly equal to, those of IC50 of the four antioxidants, suggesting that the use of TEAC was effective for reducing the variance among the laboratories. These results showed that the proposed DPPH assay could be used as a standard method to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of food additives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904668880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904668880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2116/analsci.30.717
DO - 10.2116/analsci.30.717
M3 - Article
C2 - 25007929
AN - SCOPUS:84904668880
SN - 0910-6340
VL - 30
SP - 717
EP - 721
JO - Analytical Sciences
JF - Analytical Sciences
IS - 7
ER -