TY - JOUR
T1 - Aqueous and Nonaqueous Sodium-Air Cells with Nanoporous Gold Cathode
AU - Hashimoto, Taijyu
AU - Hayashi, Katsuro
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI No. 26289235) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center, MEXT, Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/11/10
Y1 - 2015/11/10
N2 - Two types of sodium-air cells, i.e., nonaqueous and mixed aqueous-nonaqueous (abbreviated as 'aqueous') cells, have been compared to elucidate factors limiting performances of nonaqueous air cells and how the aqueous electrolyte is effective to reliving these limitation. The two cells have the same configuration consisting of a nanoporous gold (NPG) air electrode and a ceramic separator of fast sodium ion conductor, NASICON. Only the selection of catholyte, either alkyl carbonate-based nonaqueous solution of NaClO4 or aqueous solution of NaOH, is different. All performances are demonstrated to be better for the aqueous one. Lower overpotential of aqueous cell leads to better round-trip efficiency. A large resistance relevant to oxygen reduction reaction in the nonaqueous cell is relieved by changing the catholyte to the aqueous electrolyte, affording higher rate capability and power density. The aqueous electrolyte is also effective to remove the limitation of the discharge capacity defined by the volumetric amount of air electrode, as has been claimed in previous studies on aqueous Na-air cells. Furthermore, the aqueous cell is demonstrated to be robust and less sensitive and to atmosphere. The NPG electrode works reversibly in the half-cell reaction of the aqueous cell, while an electrodeposition of metallic Na on the anode during charging requires an improvement.
AB - Two types of sodium-air cells, i.e., nonaqueous and mixed aqueous-nonaqueous (abbreviated as 'aqueous') cells, have been compared to elucidate factors limiting performances of nonaqueous air cells and how the aqueous electrolyte is effective to reliving these limitation. The two cells have the same configuration consisting of a nanoporous gold (NPG) air electrode and a ceramic separator of fast sodium ion conductor, NASICON. Only the selection of catholyte, either alkyl carbonate-based nonaqueous solution of NaClO4 or aqueous solution of NaOH, is different. All performances are demonstrated to be better for the aqueous one. Lower overpotential of aqueous cell leads to better round-trip efficiency. A large resistance relevant to oxygen reduction reaction in the nonaqueous cell is relieved by changing the catholyte to the aqueous electrolyte, affording higher rate capability and power density. The aqueous electrolyte is also effective to remove the limitation of the discharge capacity defined by the volumetric amount of air electrode, as has been claimed in previous studies on aqueous Na-air cells. Furthermore, the aqueous cell is demonstrated to be robust and less sensitive and to atmosphere. The NPG electrode works reversibly in the half-cell reaction of the aqueous cell, while an electrodeposition of metallic Na on the anode during charging requires an improvement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943799311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943799311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.153
DO - 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.153
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84943799311
SN - 0013-4686
VL - 182
SP - 809
EP - 814
JO - Electrochimica Acta
JF - Electrochimica Acta
ER -