TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in the left main trunk using phase-contrast MR imaging at 3T
T2 - Comparison with 15O-labeled water positron emission tomography
AU - Kikuchi, Yasuka
AU - Naya, Masanao
AU - Manabe, Noriko Oyama
AU - Manabe, Osamu
AU - Sugimori, Hiroyuki
AU - Kudo, Kohsuke
AU - Kato, Fumi
AU - Aikawa, Tadao
AU - Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
AU - Tamaki, Nagara
AU - Shirato, Hiroki
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Yuuki Tomiyama, PhD, and Chietsugu Katoh, MD, PhD, for support. In addition, this research is partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI (contract grant number: 40443957), Japan Radiological Society Bayer Grant (to O.M.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to verify coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) on the left main trunk (LMT) in comparison with myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by 15O-labeled water positron emission tomography (PET) (MFR-PET) in both the healthy adults and the patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and to evaluate the feasibility of CFVR to detect CAD. Methods: Eighteen healthy adults and 13 patients with CAD were evaluated. CFVR in LMT was estimated by 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with phase contrast technique. MFR-PET in the LMT territory including anterior descending artery and circumflex artery was calculated as the ratio of myocardial blood flow (MBF)-PET at stress to MBF-PET at rest. Results: There was a significant positive relationship between CFVR and MFR-PET (R = 0.45, P < 0.0001). Inter-observer calculations of CFVR showed good correlation (R2 = 0.93, P < 0.0001). The CFVR in patients with CAD was significantly lower than that in healthy adults (1.90 ± 0.61 vs. 2.77 ± 1.03, respectively, P = 0.01), which were similar to the results of MFR-PET (2.23 ± 0.84 vs. 3.96 ± 1.04, respectively, P < 0.0001). For the detection of patients with CAD, the area under the curve was 0.78 (P = 0.01). The sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity was 0.72 when a cut-off of 2.15 was used. Conclusion: CFVR by 3T was validated with MFR-PET. CFVR could detect the patients with CAD. This method is a simple and reliable index without radiation or contrast material.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to verify coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) on the left main trunk (LMT) in comparison with myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by 15O-labeled water positron emission tomography (PET) (MFR-PET) in both the healthy adults and the patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and to evaluate the feasibility of CFVR to detect CAD. Methods: Eighteen healthy adults and 13 patients with CAD were evaluated. CFVR in LMT was estimated by 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with phase contrast technique. MFR-PET in the LMT territory including anterior descending artery and circumflex artery was calculated as the ratio of myocardial blood flow (MBF)-PET at stress to MBF-PET at rest. Results: There was a significant positive relationship between CFVR and MFR-PET (R = 0.45, P < 0.0001). Inter-observer calculations of CFVR showed good correlation (R2 = 0.93, P < 0.0001). The CFVR in patients with CAD was significantly lower than that in healthy adults (1.90 ± 0.61 vs. 2.77 ± 1.03, respectively, P = 0.01), which were similar to the results of MFR-PET (2.23 ± 0.84 vs. 3.96 ± 1.04, respectively, P < 0.0001). For the detection of patients with CAD, the area under the curve was 0.78 (P = 0.01). The sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity was 0.72 when a cut-off of 2.15 was used. Conclusion: CFVR by 3T was validated with MFR-PET. CFVR could detect the patients with CAD. This method is a simple and reliable index without radiation or contrast material.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064722537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064722537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0003
DO - 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0003
M3 - Article
C2 - 30047496
AN - SCOPUS:85064722537
SN - 1347-3182
VL - 18
SP - 134
EP - 141
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
IS - 2
ER -