TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between sex and outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
AU - Takada, Kazuki
AU - Shimokawa, Mototsugu
AU - Mizuki, Fumitaka
AU - Takamori, Shinkichi
AU - Takenaka, Tomoyoshi
AU - Miura, Naoko
AU - Shikada, Yasunori
AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Melissa Crawford, PhD, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac ) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Introduction: Recently, several meta-analyses have investigated the association between sex and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this issue remains controversial, because the results have been inconsistent. Moreover, the effect of sex on outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine the association between sex and outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus from database inception to Feb 18, 2022 and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and controlled clinical trials investigating ICI+non-ICI vs non-ICI as a first-line therapy in NSCLC. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in male and female patients were calculated using common and random-effects models. Results: We analyzed 5,830 patients, comprising 4,137 (71.0%) males and 1,693 (29.0%) females, from nine randomized clinical trials. The pooled HR (95%CI) for OS comparing ICI+non-ICI vs non-ICI was 0.80 (0.72–0.87) for males and 0.69 (0.54–0.89) for females. The pooled HR (95%CI) for PFS comparing ICI+non-ICI vs non-ICI was 0.60 (0.55–0.66) for males and 0.56 (0.44–0.70) for females. Conclusions: In patients with NSCLC receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy, a greater improvement in OS and PFS was observed in female patients than in male patients.
AB - Introduction: Recently, several meta-analyses have investigated the association between sex and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this issue remains controversial, because the results have been inconsistent. Moreover, the effect of sex on outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine the association between sex and outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus from database inception to Feb 18, 2022 and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and controlled clinical trials investigating ICI+non-ICI vs non-ICI as a first-line therapy in NSCLC. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in male and female patients were calculated using common and random-effects models. Results: We analyzed 5,830 patients, comprising 4,137 (71.0%) males and 1,693 (29.0%) females, from nine randomized clinical trials. The pooled HR (95%CI) for OS comparing ICI+non-ICI vs non-ICI was 0.80 (0.72–0.87) for males and 0.69 (0.54–0.89) for females. The pooled HR (95%CI) for PFS comparing ICI+non-ICI vs non-ICI was 0.60 (0.55–0.66) for males and 0.56 (0.44–0.70) for females. Conclusions: In patients with NSCLC receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy, a greater improvement in OS and PFS was observed in female patients than in male patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136440062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136440062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40001-022-00789-7
DO - 10.1186/s40001-022-00789-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35999618
AN - SCOPUS:85136440062
VL - 27
JO - European Journal of Medical Research
JF - European Journal of Medical Research
SN - 0949-2321
IS - 1
M1 - 157
ER -