TY - JOUR
T1 - Combination antiemetic therapy with aprepitant/fosaprepitant in patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (SENRI trial)
T2 - A multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial
AU - Nishimura, Junichi
AU - Satoh, Taroh
AU - Fukunaga, Mutsumi
AU - Takemoto, Hiroyoshi
AU - Nakata, Ken
AU - Ide, Yoshihito
AU - Fukuzaki, Takayuki
AU - Kudo, Toshihiro
AU - Miyake, Yasuhiro
AU - Yasui, Masayoshi
AU - Morita, Shunji
AU - Sakai, Daisuke
AU - Uemura, Mamoru
AU - Hata, Taishi
AU - Takemasa, Ichiro
AU - Mizushima, Tsunekazu
AU - Ohno, Yuko
AU - Yamamoto, Hirofumi
AU - Sekimoto, Mitsugu
AU - Nezu, Riichiro
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Mori, Masaki
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is supported by a grant from The Supporting Center for Clinical Research and Education (Osaka, Japan) , a non-profit foundation. We thank the patients for their participation in this study, the study management team and staff at individual study sites.
Funding Information:
TS has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Daiici Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Serono Co. Ltd, Bayer Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Merck Serono Co. Ltd, Bristol-Myers K.K., Taiho pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Bayer Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and departmental research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd. TK, and DS has departmental research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd. JN, MF, HT, KN, YI, TF, TM, MY, SM, MU, TH, IT, TM, YO, HY, MS, RN, YD, and MM declare no competing interest.
PY - 2015/5/30
Y1 - 2015/5/30
N2 - Introduction The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant is recommended in several guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea & vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Little is known about the feasibility and safety of aprepitant in patients treated with oxaliplatin. Methods In this multicentre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with colorectal cancer who underwent an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the control group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist + dexamethasone) or aprepitant group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist + dexamethasone + aprepitant or fosaprepitant) in the first course. All patients were treated with aprepitant/fosaprepitant therapy in the second course. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with no emesis. Results A total of 413 patients entered this clinical trial from 25 centres in Japan. Significantly more patients in the aprepitant group achieved no vomiting overall and delayed phase than those in the control group (95.7% versus 83.6%, and 95.7% versus 84.7%, respectively). The aprepitant group also had statistically significantly higher percentages of no significant nausea, complete response and complete protection than the control group overall. In the control group, the percentages of no vomiting were higher in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The incidence of vomiting occurred day 7 or later was significantly higher in the control group compared with the aprepitant group. Other adverse events were not significant between the groups. Conclusion The aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy for prevention of CINV in colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based regimen.
AB - Introduction The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant is recommended in several guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea & vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Little is known about the feasibility and safety of aprepitant in patients treated with oxaliplatin. Methods In this multicentre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with colorectal cancer who underwent an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the control group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist + dexamethasone) or aprepitant group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist + dexamethasone + aprepitant or fosaprepitant) in the first course. All patients were treated with aprepitant/fosaprepitant therapy in the second course. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with no emesis. Results A total of 413 patients entered this clinical trial from 25 centres in Japan. Significantly more patients in the aprepitant group achieved no vomiting overall and delayed phase than those in the control group (95.7% versus 83.6%, and 95.7% versus 84.7%, respectively). The aprepitant group also had statistically significantly higher percentages of no significant nausea, complete response and complete protection than the control group overall. In the control group, the percentages of no vomiting were higher in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The incidence of vomiting occurred day 7 or later was significantly higher in the control group compared with the aprepitant group. Other adverse events were not significant between the groups. Conclusion The aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy for prevention of CINV in colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based regimen.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930045312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930045312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.024
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 25922233
AN - SCOPUS:84930045312
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 51
SP - 1274
EP - 1282
JO - European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology
IS - 10
ER -