TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints
AU - Miyama, Kazuki
AU - Bise, Ryoma
AU - Ikemura, Satoshi
AU - Kai, Kazuhiro
AU - Kanahori, Masaya
AU - Arisumi, Shinkichi
AU - Uchida, Taisuke
AU - Nakashima, Yasuharu
AU - Uchida, Seiichi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant Number 19K09652.
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge Shota Harada, Kazuya Nishimura, and Kengo Araki for their great help in preparing the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: X-ray images are commonly used to assess the bone destruction of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to propose an automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system fully utilizing deep neural networks (DNN). This system detects all target joints of the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) from a hand X-ray image. It then classifies every target joint as intact (SHS = 0) or non-intact (SHS ≥ 1). Methods: We used 226 hand X-ray images of 40 rheumatoid arthritis patients. As for detection, we used a DNN model called DeepLabCut. As for classification, we built four classification models that classify the detected joint as intact or non-intact. The first model classifies each joint independently, whereas the second model does it while comparing the same contralateral joint. The third model compares the same joint group (e.g., the proximal interphalangeal joints) of one hand and the fourth model compares the same joint group of both hands. We evaluated DeepLabCut’s detection performance and classification models’ performances. The classification models’ performances were compared to three orthopedic surgeons. Results: Detection rates for all the target joints were 98.0% and 97.3% for erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN). Among the four classification models, the model that compares the same contralateral joint showed the best F-measure (0.70, 0.81) and area under the curve of the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) (0.73, 0.85) regarding erosion and JSN. As for erosion, the F-measure and PR-AUC of this model were better than the best of the orthopedic surgeons. Conclusions: The proposed system was useful. All the target joints were detected with high accuracy. The classification model that compared the same contralateral joint showed better performance than the orthopedic surgeons regarding erosion.
AB - Background: X-ray images are commonly used to assess the bone destruction of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to propose an automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system fully utilizing deep neural networks (DNN). This system detects all target joints of the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) from a hand X-ray image. It then classifies every target joint as intact (SHS = 0) or non-intact (SHS ≥ 1). Methods: We used 226 hand X-ray images of 40 rheumatoid arthritis patients. As for detection, we used a DNN model called DeepLabCut. As for classification, we built four classification models that classify the detected joint as intact or non-intact. The first model classifies each joint independently, whereas the second model does it while comparing the same contralateral joint. The third model compares the same joint group (e.g., the proximal interphalangeal joints) of one hand and the fourth model compares the same joint group of both hands. We evaluated DeepLabCut’s detection performance and classification models’ performances. The classification models’ performances were compared to three orthopedic surgeons. Results: Detection rates for all the target joints were 98.0% and 97.3% for erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN). Among the four classification models, the model that compares the same contralateral joint showed the best F-measure (0.70, 0.81) and area under the curve of the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) (0.73, 0.85) regarding erosion and JSN. As for erosion, the F-measure and PR-AUC of this model were better than the best of the orthopedic surgeons. Conclusions: The proposed system was useful. All the target joints were detected with high accuracy. The classification model that compared the same contralateral joint showed better performance than the orthopedic surgeons regarding erosion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139132974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139132974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7
DO - 10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 36192761
AN - SCOPUS:85139132974
SN - 1478-6354
VL - 24
JO - Arthritis Research and Therapy
JF - Arthritis Research and Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 227
ER -