Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data

Takuhiko Murakami, Tetsuji Ota, Tsuyoshi Kajisa, Nobuya Mizoue, Shigejiro Yoshida

研究成果: 著書/レポートタイプへの貢献会議での発言

抄録

Detecting the occurrence of clear-cutting is a practical use for remotely sensed data, and the image differencing method is one technique that can be used. This method is simple and powerful, but a systematic evaluation of its accuracy and a statistical determination of threshold values have not been established. We examined the accuracy of image differencing methods using a single band or band combinations, or scene combinations, to detect clear-cuts with LANDSAT/ TM data. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between clear-cut size and detection accuracy with a focus on the most effective bands. Results showed that bands 3 and 7 are optimal because they detect clear-cut areas with less error. Accuracy varied with the clear-cut size, and clear-cut regions less than 1 ha in area exhibited more error.

元の言語英語
ホスト出版物のタイトル31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010
ページ1530-1535
ページ数6
出版物ステータス出版済み - 12 1 2010
イベント31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010 - Hanoi, ベトナム
継続期間: 11 1 201011 5 2010

出版物シリーズ

名前31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010
2

その他

その他31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010
ベトナム
Hanoi
期間11/1/1011/5/10

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Networks and Communications

これを引用

Murakami, T., Ota, T., Kajisa, T., Mizoue, N., & Yoshida, S. (2010). Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data. : 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010 (pp. 1530-1535). (31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010; 巻数 2).

Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data. / Murakami, Takuhiko; Ota, Tetsuji; Kajisa, Tsuyoshi; Mizoue, Nobuya; Yoshida, Shigejiro.

31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010. 2010. p. 1530-1535 (31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010; 巻 2).

研究成果: 著書/レポートタイプへの貢献会議での発言

Murakami, T, Ota, T, Kajisa, T, Mizoue, N & Yoshida, S 2010, Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data. : 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010. 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010, 巻. 2, pp. 1530-1535, 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010, Hanoi, ベトナム, 11/1/10.
Murakami T, Ota T, Kajisa T, Mizoue N, Yoshida S. Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data. : 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010. 2010. p. 1530-1535. (31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010).
Murakami, Takuhiko ; Ota, Tetsuji ; Kajisa, Tsuyoshi ; Mizoue, Nobuya ; Yoshida, Shigejiro. / Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data. 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010. 2010. pp. 1530-1535 (31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010).
@inproceedings{1480524153f14b43b320489d91866fc4,
title = "Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data",
abstract = "Detecting the occurrence of clear-cutting is a practical use for remotely sensed data, and the image differencing method is one technique that can be used. This method is simple and powerful, but a systematic evaluation of its accuracy and a statistical determination of threshold values have not been established. We examined the accuracy of image differencing methods using a single band or band combinations, or scene combinations, to detect clear-cuts with LANDSAT/ TM data. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between clear-cut size and detection accuracy with a focus on the most effective bands. Results showed that bands 3 and 7 are optimal because they detect clear-cut areas with less error. Accuracy varied with the clear-cut size, and clear-cut regions less than 1 ha in area exhibited more error.",
author = "Takuhiko Murakami and Tetsuji Ota and Tsuyoshi Kajisa and Nobuya Mizoue and Shigejiro Yoshida",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781617823978",
series = "31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010",
pages = "1530--1535",
booktitle = "31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Detection of clear-cut areas using the image differencing method with LANDSAT/TM data

AU - Murakami, Takuhiko

AU - Ota, Tetsuji

AU - Kajisa, Tsuyoshi

AU - Mizoue, Nobuya

AU - Yoshida, Shigejiro

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Detecting the occurrence of clear-cutting is a practical use for remotely sensed data, and the image differencing method is one technique that can be used. This method is simple and powerful, but a systematic evaluation of its accuracy and a statistical determination of threshold values have not been established. We examined the accuracy of image differencing methods using a single band or band combinations, or scene combinations, to detect clear-cuts with LANDSAT/ TM data. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between clear-cut size and detection accuracy with a focus on the most effective bands. Results showed that bands 3 and 7 are optimal because they detect clear-cut areas with less error. Accuracy varied with the clear-cut size, and clear-cut regions less than 1 ha in area exhibited more error.

AB - Detecting the occurrence of clear-cutting is a practical use for remotely sensed data, and the image differencing method is one technique that can be used. This method is simple and powerful, but a systematic evaluation of its accuracy and a statistical determination of threshold values have not been established. We examined the accuracy of image differencing methods using a single band or band combinations, or scene combinations, to detect clear-cuts with LANDSAT/ TM data. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between clear-cut size and detection accuracy with a focus on the most effective bands. Results showed that bands 3 and 7 are optimal because they detect clear-cut areas with less error. Accuracy varied with the clear-cut size, and clear-cut regions less than 1 ha in area exhibited more error.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865656221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865656221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84865656221

SN - 9781617823978

T3 - 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010

SP - 1530

EP - 1535

BT - 31st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2010, ACRS 2010

ER -