TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing effective CO2 and SO2 mitigation strategy based on marginal abatement costs of coal-fired power plants in China
AU - Nakaishi, Tomoaki
N1 - Funding Information:
An early manuscript was prepared for the 14th Biennial International Conference on EcoBalance held online in 2021.I am grateful to the editor and anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. I accept full responsibility for any errors in the manuscript. This research was supported by Kyushu University Platform of Inter-/Transdisciplinary Energy Research. [Support Program for Doctoral Students AY2020]
Funding Information:
This research was supported by Kyushu University Platform of Inter-/Transdisciplinary Energy Research. [Support Program for Doctoral Students AY2020]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/7/15
Y1 - 2021/7/15
N2 - This study proposes a novel analysis framework to investigate the CO2 and SO2 emission efficiency, emission reduction potential, and marginal abatement cost (MAC) of 316 coal-fired power plants in China. The comprehensive analysis framework is based on the combined approach of utilizing the directional output distance function (DODF) and parametric linear programming (PLP). The average emission efficiencies of CO2 and SO2 were 0.48 and 0.61, respectively, which indicates that China's coal-fired power plants have a large potential to reduce CO2 and SO2 emissions, on average by 52% and 39%, respectively. In 2010, the average CO2 and SO2 emissions reduction potential for the 316 investigated power plants were 1,517 kt and 3,773 t, respectively. The average MAC prices for CO2 and SO2 were estimated to be 598 yuan/tonne and 22,401 yuan/tonne, respectively, indicating that the reduction of such emissions is very expensive. Furthermore, I formulated an optimization problem for maximizing CO2 and SO2 emission reductions under the governmental budget constraint. Solving this optimization problem yielded the total cost for the maximum reductions of CO2 and SO2 emissions, the maximum possible reductions for CO2 and SO2 emissions for each allocated budget scale, and the optimal budget allocation for each power plant at a given budget scale. I finally suggest effective mitigation strategies for CO2 and SO2 emissions generated from China's coal-fired power plants.
AB - This study proposes a novel analysis framework to investigate the CO2 and SO2 emission efficiency, emission reduction potential, and marginal abatement cost (MAC) of 316 coal-fired power plants in China. The comprehensive analysis framework is based on the combined approach of utilizing the directional output distance function (DODF) and parametric linear programming (PLP). The average emission efficiencies of CO2 and SO2 were 0.48 and 0.61, respectively, which indicates that China's coal-fired power plants have a large potential to reduce CO2 and SO2 emissions, on average by 52% and 39%, respectively. In 2010, the average CO2 and SO2 emissions reduction potential for the 316 investigated power plants were 1,517 kt and 3,773 t, respectively. The average MAC prices for CO2 and SO2 were estimated to be 598 yuan/tonne and 22,401 yuan/tonne, respectively, indicating that the reduction of such emissions is very expensive. Furthermore, I formulated an optimization problem for maximizing CO2 and SO2 emission reductions under the governmental budget constraint. Solving this optimization problem yielded the total cost for the maximum reductions of CO2 and SO2 emissions, the maximum possible reductions for CO2 and SO2 emissions for each allocated budget scale, and the optimal budget allocation for each power plant at a given budget scale. I finally suggest effective mitigation strategies for CO2 and SO2 emissions generated from China's coal-fired power plants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105052844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105052844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116978
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116978
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105052844
SN - 0306-2619
VL - 294
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
M1 - 116978
ER -