TY - JOUR
T1 - Douglas–Rachford splitting and ADMM for nonconvex optimization
T2 - Tight convergence results
AU - Themelis, Andreas
AU - Patrinos, Panagiotis
N1 - Funding Information:
∗Received by the editors January 5, 2018; accepted for publication (in revised form) August 26, 2019; published electronically January 9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1163993 Funding: This work was supported by KU Leuven internal funding, StG/15/043 Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique–FNRS, and by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek–Vlaanderen under EOS project 30468160 (SeLMA) and FWO projects G086318N and G086518N. †Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-STADIUS), KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven, Belgium (andreas.themelis@kuleuven.be, panos.patrinos@esat.kuleuven.be).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Although originally designed and analyzed for convex problems, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) and its close relatives, Douglas–Rachford splitting (DRS) and Peaceman–Rachford splitting (PRS), have been observed to perform remarkably well when applied to certain classes of structured nonconvex optimization problems. However, partial global convergence results in the nonconvex setting have only recently emerged. In this paper we show how the Douglas–Rachford envelope, introduced in 2014, can be employed to unify and considerably simplify the theory for devising global convergence guarantees for ADMM, DRS, and PRS applied to nonconvex problems under less restrictive conditions, larger prox-stepsizes, and overrelaxation parameters than previously known. In fact, our bounds are tight whenever the overrelaxation parameter ranges in (0, 2]. The analysis of ADMM uses a universal primal equivalence with DRS that generalizes the known duality of the algorithms.
AB - Although originally designed and analyzed for convex problems, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) and its close relatives, Douglas–Rachford splitting (DRS) and Peaceman–Rachford splitting (PRS), have been observed to perform remarkably well when applied to certain classes of structured nonconvex optimization problems. However, partial global convergence results in the nonconvex setting have only recently emerged. In this paper we show how the Douglas–Rachford envelope, introduced in 2014, can be employed to unify and considerably simplify the theory for devising global convergence guarantees for ADMM, DRS, and PRS applied to nonconvex problems under less restrictive conditions, larger prox-stepsizes, and overrelaxation parameters than previously known. In fact, our bounds are tight whenever the overrelaxation parameter ranges in (0, 2]. The analysis of ADMM uses a universal primal equivalence with DRS that generalizes the known duality of the algorithms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084913835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084913835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1137/18M1163993
DO - 10.1137/18M1163993
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084913835
VL - 30
SP - 149
EP - 181
JO - SIAM Journal on Optimization
JF - SIAM Journal on Optimization
SN - 1052-6234
IS - 1
ER -