TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of canagliflozin on renal and cardiovascular outcomes across different levels of albuminuria
T2 - Data from the CANVAS program
AU - Neuen, Brendon L.
AU - Ohkuma, Toshiaki
AU - Neal, Bruce
AU - Matthews, David R.
AU - De Zeeuw, Dick
AU - Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
AU - Fulcher, Greg
AU - Li, Qiang
AU - Jardine, Meg
AU - Oh, Richard
AU - Heerspink, Hiddo L.
AU - Perkovic, Vlado
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Neuen is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Postgraduate Scholarship; the John Chalmers PhD Scholarship from The George Institute for Global Health; a University Postgraduate Award from University of New South Wales Sydney; the Graduate Research Fund at Lincoln College, University of Oxford; and an Oxford Australia Clarendon Scholarship from the University of Oxford. He has received travel support from Janssen. Dr. Ohkuma is supported by the John Chalmers Clinical Research Fellowship of The George Institute for Global Health. Mr. Li reports being a full-time employee of The George Institute for Global Health. Dr. Neal reports being supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Principal Research Fellowship (APP1106947); serving on advisory boards and/or acting as consultant for Janssen and Merck Sharpe and Dohme; and receiving lecture fees from Janssen with any consultancy, honoraria, or travel support paid to his institution. Dr. Matthews reports receiving research support from Janssen; serving on advisory boards and as a consultant for Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Janssen, and Servier; and giving lectures for Novo Nordisk, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Aché Laboratories. Dr. de Zeeuw reports serving on advisory boards and/ or as a speaker for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fresenius, Mundipharma, and Mitsubishi Tanabe; serving on steering committees and/or as a speaker for AbbVie and Janssen; and serving on data safety and monitoring committees for Bayer. Dr. Mahaffey reports grants from Afferent, Amgen, Apple, Inc., AstraZeneca, Cardiva Medical, Inc., Daiichi, Ferring, Google (Verily), Johnson & Johnson, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, NIH, Novartis, Sanofi, St. Jude, and Tenax and personal fees from Abbott, Ablynx, AstraZeneca, Baim Institute, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Elsevier, GlaxoSmithKline Johnson & Johnson, MedErgy, Medscape, Mitsubishi, Myokardia, NIH, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Portola, Radiometer, Regeneron, SmartMedics, Springer Publishing, and UCSF. Dr. Fulcher reports receiving research support from Novo Nordisk and serving on advisory boards and as a consultant for Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Merck Sharp and Dohme. Dr. Jardine is supported by a Medical Research Future Fund Next Generation Clinical Researchers Program Career Development Fellowship; is responsible for research projects that have received unrestricted funding from Gambro, Baxter, CSL, Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck; has served on advisory boards sponsored by Akebia, Baxter, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has spoken at scientific meetings sponsored by Janssen, Amgen, and Roche, with any consultancy, honoraria, or travel support paid to her institution. Dr. Oh reports being a full-time employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Dr. Perkovic reports receiving research support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Senior Research Fellowship and Program Grant); serving on steering committees for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Pfizer; serving on advisory boards and/or speaking at scientific meetings for AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Durect, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmalink, Relypsa, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Vitae; and receiving personal fees for consulting and scientific presentations related to canagliflozin from Mitsubishi Tanabe and Mundipharma. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Funding Information:
Medical writing support was provided by Dana Tabor, PhD, of MedErgy, and was funded by Janssen Global Services, LLC. Cana-gliflozin was developed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, in collaboration with Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background If SGLT2 inhibitors protect the kidneys by reducing albuminuria as hypothesized, peoplewith type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with higher albuminuria should benefit more. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program, which randomized 10,142 participants with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk to canagliflozin or placebo. We assessed effects of canagliflozin on renal, cardiovascular, and safety outcomes by baseline albuminuria. The trial included 2266 participants (22.3%) with moderately increased albuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio [UACR] 30-300mg/g) and 760 (7.5%) with severely increased albuminuria (UACR .300 mg/g) at baseline. Results Canagliflozin lowered albuminuria with greater proportional reductions in those with moderately and severely increased albuminuria (P heterogeneity,0.001). After week 13, canagliflozin slowed the annual loss of kidney function across albuminuria subgroups, with greater absolute reductions in participants with severely increased albuminuria (placebo-subtracted difference 3.01 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year; P heterogeneity,0.001). Heterogeneity for the renal composite outcome of 40%reduction in EGFR, ESKD, or renal-related death was driven by lesser effects in participants with moderately increased albuminuria (P heterogeneity=0.03), but no effectmodification was observed when albuminuria was fitted as a continuous variable (P heterogeneity=0.94). Cardiovascular and safety outcomes were mostly consistent across albuminuria levels including increased risks for amputation across albuminuria subgroups (P heterogeneity= 0.66). Greater absolute risk reductions in the renal composite outcome were observed in participants with severely increased albuminuria (P heterogeneity=0.004). Conclusions The proportional effects of canagliflozin on renal and cardiovascular outcomes are mostly consistent across patients with different levels of albuminuria, but absolute benefits are greatest among those with severely increased albuminuria.
AB - Background If SGLT2 inhibitors protect the kidneys by reducing albuminuria as hypothesized, peoplewith type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with higher albuminuria should benefit more. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program, which randomized 10,142 participants with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk to canagliflozin or placebo. We assessed effects of canagliflozin on renal, cardiovascular, and safety outcomes by baseline albuminuria. The trial included 2266 participants (22.3%) with moderately increased albuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio [UACR] 30-300mg/g) and 760 (7.5%) with severely increased albuminuria (UACR .300 mg/g) at baseline. Results Canagliflozin lowered albuminuria with greater proportional reductions in those with moderately and severely increased albuminuria (P heterogeneity,0.001). After week 13, canagliflozin slowed the annual loss of kidney function across albuminuria subgroups, with greater absolute reductions in participants with severely increased albuminuria (placebo-subtracted difference 3.01 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year; P heterogeneity,0.001). Heterogeneity for the renal composite outcome of 40%reduction in EGFR, ESKD, or renal-related death was driven by lesser effects in participants with moderately increased albuminuria (P heterogeneity=0.03), but no effectmodification was observed when albuminuria was fitted as a continuous variable (P heterogeneity=0.94). Cardiovascular and safety outcomes were mostly consistent across albuminuria levels including increased risks for amputation across albuminuria subgroups (P heterogeneity= 0.66). Greater absolute risk reductions in the renal composite outcome were observed in participants with severely increased albuminuria (P heterogeneity=0.004). Conclusions The proportional effects of canagliflozin on renal and cardiovascular outcomes are mostly consistent across patients with different levels of albuminuria, but absolute benefits are greatest among those with severely increased albuminuria.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073746348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073746348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1681/ASN.2019010064
DO - 10.1681/ASN.2019010064
M3 - Article
C2 - 31530577
AN - SCOPUS:85073746348
SN - 1046-6673
VL - 30
SP - 2229
EP - 2242
JO - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN
JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN
IS - 11
ER -