TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with cancer treated with anti-VEGF therapy
AU - Moriyama, Shohei
AU - Hieda, Michinari
AU - Kisanuki, Megumi
AU - Kawano, Shotaro
AU - Yokoyama, Taku
AU - Fukata, Mitsuhiro
AU - Kusaba, Hitoshi
AU - Maruyama, Toru
AU - Baba, Eishi
AU - Akashi, Koichi
AU - Fukuda, Haruhisa
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants provided by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Fusion Oriented Research for disruptive Science and Technology (FOREST) Program (Grant Number: JPMJFR205J) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Program (Grant Numbers: JP20H00563 and JP19K21590).
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/12/8
Y1 - 2022/12/8
N2 - Background Cancer treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor signalling pathway (VSP) inhibitors frequently causes hypertension. Although previous reports suggested that the antihypertensive drug renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) may have a positive synergistic effect with VSP inhibitors, the actual impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. Objectives The study aims to clarify whether RASIs exhibit clinical benefits for patients with cancer with hypertension. Method From the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence Study database, comprising Japanese claims data between 2016 and 2020, we reviewed 2380 patients treated with VSP inhibitors who received antihypertensive treatment during cancer therapy. The patients were classified into two groups: with-RASI (n=883) and without-RASI (n=1497). In addition, 1803 of these patients treated for hypertension with RASI-only (n=707) or calcium channel blocker-only (n=1096) were also reviewed. The time-to-treatment failure (TTF), the interval from initiation of chemotherapy to its discontinuation, was applied as the primary endpoint. Results The median TTFs were 167 (60-382) days in the with-RASI group and 161 (63-377) days in the without-RASI group (p=0.587). All models, including Cox proportional hazard models and multiple propensity score models, did not reveal the superiority of with-RASI treatment. In the propensity score matching model, the HR for treatment with-RASI compared with that for without-RASI was 0.96 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.06, p=0.386). In addition, the TTFs of RASI-only were not superior to calcium channel blocker-only (p=0.584). Conclusions RASIs for hypertension do not benefit clinical outcomes during cancer therapy with VSP inhibitors. In addition, RASIs and calcium channel blockers have comparable clinical efficacy as first-line antihypertensive.
AB - Background Cancer treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor signalling pathway (VSP) inhibitors frequently causes hypertension. Although previous reports suggested that the antihypertensive drug renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) may have a positive synergistic effect with VSP inhibitors, the actual impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. Objectives The study aims to clarify whether RASIs exhibit clinical benefits for patients with cancer with hypertension. Method From the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence Study database, comprising Japanese claims data between 2016 and 2020, we reviewed 2380 patients treated with VSP inhibitors who received antihypertensive treatment during cancer therapy. The patients were classified into two groups: with-RASI (n=883) and without-RASI (n=1497). In addition, 1803 of these patients treated for hypertension with RASI-only (n=707) or calcium channel blocker-only (n=1096) were also reviewed. The time-to-treatment failure (TTF), the interval from initiation of chemotherapy to its discontinuation, was applied as the primary endpoint. Results The median TTFs were 167 (60-382) days in the with-RASI group and 161 (63-377) days in the without-RASI group (p=0.587). All models, including Cox proportional hazard models and multiple propensity score models, did not reveal the superiority of with-RASI treatment. In the propensity score matching model, the HR for treatment with-RASI compared with that for without-RASI was 0.96 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.06, p=0.386). In addition, the TTFs of RASI-only were not superior to calcium channel blocker-only (p=0.584). Conclusions RASIs for hypertension do not benefit clinical outcomes during cancer therapy with VSP inhibitors. In addition, RASIs and calcium channel blockers have comparable clinical efficacy as first-line antihypertensive.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143910352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143910352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002135
DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002135
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143910352
SN - 2053-3624
VL - 9
JO - Open Heart
JF - Open Heart
IS - 2
M1 - e002135
ER -