TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
T2 - Results from the PARALLEL-HF study
AU - PARALLEL-HF Investigators
AU - Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
AU - Momomura, Shin Ichi
AU - Saito, Yoshihiko
AU - Ito, Hiroshi
AU - Yamamoto, Kazuhiro
AU - Sakata, Yasushi
AU - Desai, Akshay Suvas
AU - Ohishi, Tomomi
AU - Iimori, Takayuki
AU - Kitamura, Toshihito
AU - Guo, Weinong
N1 - Funding Information:
H.T. was an Executive Committee Chair of PARALLEL-HF and has received consultation fees from Novartis Pharma K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer Yakuhin, Ono Pharmaceutical; and remuneration from MSD, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, Novartis Pharma K.K., Kowa Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma; research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, IQVIA Services, Omron Healthcare; and scholarship funds from Astellas Pharma, Novartis Pharma K.K., Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Teijin Pharma, MSD.
Funding Information:
A.S.D. has received research grant support (to Brigham and Women’s Hospital) from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Bayer, and Novartis; and has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biofourmis, Boston Scientific, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Relypsa, Regeneron, and Sun Pharma.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Japanese Circulation Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: In the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) With ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A prospective randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese HFrEF patients. Methods and Results: In the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEi to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients (PARALLEL-HF) study, 225 Japanese HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%) were randomized (1: 1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Over a median follow up of 33.9 months, no significant between-group difference was observed for the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.65-1.82; P=0.6260). Early and sustained reductions in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline were observed with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (between-group difference: Week 2: 25.7%, P<0.01; Month 6: 18.9%, P=0.01, favoring sacubitril/valsartan). There was no significant difference in the changes in NYHA class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score at Week 8 and Month 6. Sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated with fewer study drug discontinuations due to adverse events, although the sacubitril/valsartan group had a higher proportion of patients with hypotension. Conclusions: In Japanese patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in reduction in the risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated.
AB - Background: In the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) With ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A prospective randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese HFrEF patients. Methods and Results: In the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEi to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients (PARALLEL-HF) study, 225 Japanese HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%) were randomized (1: 1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Over a median follow up of 33.9 months, no significant between-group difference was observed for the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.65-1.82; P=0.6260). Early and sustained reductions in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline were observed with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (between-group difference: Week 2: 25.7%, P<0.01; Month 6: 18.9%, P=0.01, favoring sacubitril/valsartan). There was no significant difference in the changes in NYHA class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score at Week 8 and Month 6. Sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated with fewer study drug discontinuations due to adverse events, although the sacubitril/valsartan group had a higher proportion of patients with hypotension. Conclusions: In Japanese patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in reduction in the risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105765471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105765471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1253/CIRCJ.CJ-20-0854
DO - 10.1253/CIRCJ.CJ-20-0854
M3 - Article
C2 - 33731544
AN - SCOPUS:85105765471
SN - 1346-9843
VL - 85
SP - 584
EP - 594
JO - Circulation Journal
JF - Circulation Journal
IS - 5
ER -