Evosystem services

An evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being

Daniel P. Faith, Susana Magallón, Andrew P. Hendry, Elena Conti, Tetsukazu Yahara, Michael J. Donoghue

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿評論記事

104 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

A framework for exploring regional-scale trade-offs among ecosystem services and biodiversity protection has been established for some time, and it is clear that optimizing these trade-offs provides a strategy to address targets for a reduced rate of biodiversity loss. Recent trade-off studies have highlighted the need for better biodiversity measures, to complement measures of ecosystem services. Biodiversity typically has been linked in this context to existence and other non-use values. We argue that biodiversity will have a stronger role in such trade-off analyses if measures of biodiversity better reflect additional current and future services. These 'evosystem services' have been, and, if we are careful, can continue to be provided by the evolutionary process. Some services have been provided through evolution operating in the past, and a phylogenetic diversity measure can help us to quantify these current and potential future benefits derived from the tree of life. Furthermore, a variety of evosystem services are delivered through ongoing contemporary evolution, and value should therefore be placed on the maintenance of healthy evosystems. We argue that the concept of evosystem services could be useful as a complement to the traditional concept of ecosystem services. Together, these reflect a fuller range of the services supported by biodiversity, and thereby provide a sounder basis for conservation planning and decision-making.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)66-74
ページ数9
ジャーナルCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
2
発行部数1-2
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 5 1 2010

Fingerprint

biodiversity
well-being
ecosystem service
trade-off
conservation planning
services
decision making
phylogenetics
conservation
planning
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

これを引用

Evosystem services : An evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. / Faith, Daniel P.; Magallón, Susana; Hendry, Andrew P.; Conti, Elena; Yahara, Tetsukazu; Donoghue, Michael J.

:: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 巻 2, 番号 1-2, 01.05.2010, p. 66-74.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿評論記事

Faith, Daniel P. ; Magallón, Susana ; Hendry, Andrew P. ; Conti, Elena ; Yahara, Tetsukazu ; Donoghue, Michael J. / Evosystem services : An evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. :: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2010 ; 巻 2, 番号 1-2. pp. 66-74.
@article{9d7480f9253c4c60b78913b7d7972a50,
title = "Evosystem services: An evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being",
abstract = "A framework for exploring regional-scale trade-offs among ecosystem services and biodiversity protection has been established for some time, and it is clear that optimizing these trade-offs provides a strategy to address targets for a reduced rate of biodiversity loss. Recent trade-off studies have highlighted the need for better biodiversity measures, to complement measures of ecosystem services. Biodiversity typically has been linked in this context to existence and other non-use values. We argue that biodiversity will have a stronger role in such trade-off analyses if measures of biodiversity better reflect additional current and future services. These 'evosystem services' have been, and, if we are careful, can continue to be provided by the evolutionary process. Some services have been provided through evolution operating in the past, and a phylogenetic diversity measure can help us to quantify these current and potential future benefits derived from the tree of life. Furthermore, a variety of evosystem services are delivered through ongoing contemporary evolution, and value should therefore be placed on the maintenance of healthy evosystems. We argue that the concept of evosystem services could be useful as a complement to the traditional concept of ecosystem services. Together, these reflect a fuller range of the services supported by biodiversity, and thereby provide a sounder basis for conservation planning and decision-making.",
author = "Faith, {Daniel P.} and Susana Magall{\'o}n and Hendry, {Andrew P.} and Elena Conti and Tetsukazu Yahara and Donoghue, {Michael J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "66--74",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evosystem services

T2 - An evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being

AU - Faith, Daniel P.

AU - Magallón, Susana

AU - Hendry, Andrew P.

AU - Conti, Elena

AU - Yahara, Tetsukazu

AU - Donoghue, Michael J.

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - A framework for exploring regional-scale trade-offs among ecosystem services and biodiversity protection has been established for some time, and it is clear that optimizing these trade-offs provides a strategy to address targets for a reduced rate of biodiversity loss. Recent trade-off studies have highlighted the need for better biodiversity measures, to complement measures of ecosystem services. Biodiversity typically has been linked in this context to existence and other non-use values. We argue that biodiversity will have a stronger role in such trade-off analyses if measures of biodiversity better reflect additional current and future services. These 'evosystem services' have been, and, if we are careful, can continue to be provided by the evolutionary process. Some services have been provided through evolution operating in the past, and a phylogenetic diversity measure can help us to quantify these current and potential future benefits derived from the tree of life. Furthermore, a variety of evosystem services are delivered through ongoing contemporary evolution, and value should therefore be placed on the maintenance of healthy evosystems. We argue that the concept of evosystem services could be useful as a complement to the traditional concept of ecosystem services. Together, these reflect a fuller range of the services supported by biodiversity, and thereby provide a sounder basis for conservation planning and decision-making.

AB - A framework for exploring regional-scale trade-offs among ecosystem services and biodiversity protection has been established for some time, and it is clear that optimizing these trade-offs provides a strategy to address targets for a reduced rate of biodiversity loss. Recent trade-off studies have highlighted the need for better biodiversity measures, to complement measures of ecosystem services. Biodiversity typically has been linked in this context to existence and other non-use values. We argue that biodiversity will have a stronger role in such trade-off analyses if measures of biodiversity better reflect additional current and future services. These 'evosystem services' have been, and, if we are careful, can continue to be provided by the evolutionary process. Some services have been provided through evolution operating in the past, and a phylogenetic diversity measure can help us to quantify these current and potential future benefits derived from the tree of life. Furthermore, a variety of evosystem services are delivered through ongoing contemporary evolution, and value should therefore be placed on the maintenance of healthy evosystems. We argue that the concept of evosystem services could be useful as a complement to the traditional concept of ecosystem services. Together, these reflect a fuller range of the services supported by biodiversity, and thereby provide a sounder basis for conservation planning and decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954865387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954865387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002

M3 - Review article

VL - 2

SP - 66

EP - 74

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

IS - 1-2

ER -