Habitat complexity in aquatic systems: Fractals and beyond

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿評論記事

89 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Despite the intensity with which ecological information involving habitat complexity has been amassed to date, much remains to be revealed for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics and implications of the structural complexity of habitats and its influences on ecological communities. This review examines the multi-faceted characteristics of habitat complexity, focusing in particular on aquatic ecosystems. Habitat complexity in aquatic systems is characterised by at least five different traits of physical structure: (1) spatial scales, (2) diversity of complexity-generating physical (structural) elements, (3) spatial arrangement of elements, (4) sizes of elements, (5) abundance/density of elements. Of these five traits, the concept of fractal dimension fully encompasses only the last one; in this sense, habitat complexity is more complex than what fractal measures represent. It is therefore important to investigate exactly which traits of habitat structure are exerting influences on organisms/communities. We hypothesise that, where an entire range of possible fractal dimension D is considered, intermediate levels of D are most likely to be associated with the highest level of biodiversity, to which the body size spectra of assemblages would have a close bearing. In most aquatic ecosystems, broadly two-dimensional structures of bottom substrate at the scale of 1-10 m mean that the addition of vertical, three dimensional structures almost always implies an increase in both the 'diversity' and 'abundance' components of structural elements, resulting in more habitats being made available to organisms of different sizes and functional designs. The conservation and management of aquatic ecosystems would be facilitated by rigorous assessments of linkages between habitat complexity and aquatic communities, for which an integrative approach to habitat complexity seems to offer a useful and versatile framework.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)27-47
ページ数21
ジャーナルHydrobiologia
685
発行部数1
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 4 1 2012

Fingerprint

aquatic habitat
habitat
habitats
aquatic ecosystem
fractal dimensions
aquatic communities
aquatic community
habitat structure
organisms
mechanics
body size
biodiversity
substrate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aquatic Science

これを引用

Habitat complexity in aquatic systems : Fractals and beyond. / Tokeshi, Mutsunori; Arakaki, Seiji.

:: Hydrobiologia, 巻 685, 番号 1, 01.04.2012, p. 27-47.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿評論記事

@article{72ec0c4c0d49403f82a40d87ce1f740b,
title = "Habitat complexity in aquatic systems: Fractals and beyond",
abstract = "Despite the intensity with which ecological information involving habitat complexity has been amassed to date, much remains to be revealed for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics and implications of the structural complexity of habitats and its influences on ecological communities. This review examines the multi-faceted characteristics of habitat complexity, focusing in particular on aquatic ecosystems. Habitat complexity in aquatic systems is characterised by at least five different traits of physical structure: (1) spatial scales, (2) diversity of complexity-generating physical (structural) elements, (3) spatial arrangement of elements, (4) sizes of elements, (5) abundance/density of elements. Of these five traits, the concept of fractal dimension fully encompasses only the last one; in this sense, habitat complexity is more complex than what fractal measures represent. It is therefore important to investigate exactly which traits of habitat structure are exerting influences on organisms/communities. We hypothesise that, where an entire range of possible fractal dimension D is considered, intermediate levels of D are most likely to be associated with the highest level of biodiversity, to which the body size spectra of assemblages would have a close bearing. In most aquatic ecosystems, broadly two-dimensional structures of bottom substrate at the scale of 1-10 m mean that the addition of vertical, three dimensional structures almost always implies an increase in both the 'diversity' and 'abundance' components of structural elements, resulting in more habitats being made available to organisms of different sizes and functional designs. The conservation and management of aquatic ecosystems would be facilitated by rigorous assessments of linkages between habitat complexity and aquatic communities, for which an integrative approach to habitat complexity seems to offer a useful and versatile framework.",
author = "Mutsunori Tokeshi and Seiji Arakaki",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10750-011-0832-z",
language = "English",
volume = "685",
pages = "27--47",
journal = "Hydrobiologia",
issn = "0018-8158",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habitat complexity in aquatic systems

T2 - Fractals and beyond

AU - Tokeshi, Mutsunori

AU - Arakaki, Seiji

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Despite the intensity with which ecological information involving habitat complexity has been amassed to date, much remains to be revealed for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics and implications of the structural complexity of habitats and its influences on ecological communities. This review examines the multi-faceted characteristics of habitat complexity, focusing in particular on aquatic ecosystems. Habitat complexity in aquatic systems is characterised by at least five different traits of physical structure: (1) spatial scales, (2) diversity of complexity-generating physical (structural) elements, (3) spatial arrangement of elements, (4) sizes of elements, (5) abundance/density of elements. Of these five traits, the concept of fractal dimension fully encompasses only the last one; in this sense, habitat complexity is more complex than what fractal measures represent. It is therefore important to investigate exactly which traits of habitat structure are exerting influences on organisms/communities. We hypothesise that, where an entire range of possible fractal dimension D is considered, intermediate levels of D are most likely to be associated with the highest level of biodiversity, to which the body size spectra of assemblages would have a close bearing. In most aquatic ecosystems, broadly two-dimensional structures of bottom substrate at the scale of 1-10 m mean that the addition of vertical, three dimensional structures almost always implies an increase in both the 'diversity' and 'abundance' components of structural elements, resulting in more habitats being made available to organisms of different sizes and functional designs. The conservation and management of aquatic ecosystems would be facilitated by rigorous assessments of linkages between habitat complexity and aquatic communities, for which an integrative approach to habitat complexity seems to offer a useful and versatile framework.

AB - Despite the intensity with which ecological information involving habitat complexity has been amassed to date, much remains to be revealed for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics and implications of the structural complexity of habitats and its influences on ecological communities. This review examines the multi-faceted characteristics of habitat complexity, focusing in particular on aquatic ecosystems. Habitat complexity in aquatic systems is characterised by at least five different traits of physical structure: (1) spatial scales, (2) diversity of complexity-generating physical (structural) elements, (3) spatial arrangement of elements, (4) sizes of elements, (5) abundance/density of elements. Of these five traits, the concept of fractal dimension fully encompasses only the last one; in this sense, habitat complexity is more complex than what fractal measures represent. It is therefore important to investigate exactly which traits of habitat structure are exerting influences on organisms/communities. We hypothesise that, where an entire range of possible fractal dimension D is considered, intermediate levels of D are most likely to be associated with the highest level of biodiversity, to which the body size spectra of assemblages would have a close bearing. In most aquatic ecosystems, broadly two-dimensional structures of bottom substrate at the scale of 1-10 m mean that the addition of vertical, three dimensional structures almost always implies an increase in both the 'diversity' and 'abundance' components of structural elements, resulting in more habitats being made available to organisms of different sizes and functional designs. The conservation and management of aquatic ecosystems would be facilitated by rigorous assessments of linkages between habitat complexity and aquatic communities, for which an integrative approach to habitat complexity seems to offer a useful and versatile framework.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857655789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857655789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10750-011-0832-z

DO - 10.1007/s10750-011-0832-z

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84857655789

VL - 685

SP - 27

EP - 47

JO - Hydrobiologia

JF - Hydrobiologia

SN - 0018-8158

IS - 1

ER -