How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science

研究成果: Contribution to journalComment/debate査読

18 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

The reproducibility problem that exists in various academic fields has been discussed in recent years, and it has been revealed that scientists discreetly engage in several questionable research practices (QRPs). For example, the practice of hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) involves the reconstruction of hypotheses and stories after results have been obtained (Kerr, 1998) and thereby promotes the retrospective fabrication of favorable hypotheses (cf. Bem, 2004). P-hacking encompasses various untruthful manipulations for obtaining p-values less than 0.05 (Simmons et al., 2011). Such unethical practices dramatically increase the number of false positive findings and thereby encourage the intentional fabrication of evidence as the basis of scientific knowledge and theory, which leads to individual profits for researchers.

本文言語英語
論文番号1831
ジャーナルFrontiers in Psychology
9
SEP
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 9 26 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

フィンガープリント 「How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル