Image quality and radiation dose of renal perfusion CT with low-dose contrast agent: a comparison with conventional CT using a 320-row system

Yoshiki Asayama, Akihiro Nishie, K. Ishigami, yasuhiro ushijima, Daisuke Kakihara, N. Fujita, K. Morita, K. Ishimatsu, S. Takao, Hiroshi Honda

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

抄録

AIM: To compare perfusion computed tomography (CT) with reconstructed image from source data using low-dose contrast agent and conventional 320-row CT for the evaluation of renal tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent conventional CT (C-CT) and 26 patients underwent perfusion CT with low-dose (40 ml) contrast agent. Image noise, arterial visualisation, the sharpness of the corticomedullary junction (CMJ), and overall image quality were each assessed using a four-point scale. The tumour detection rate for lesions <4 cm (n=66) was also evaluated. Quantitative image parameters including image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the renal artery and CMJ were measured. The volume CT dose index (CTDI), dose–length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were also recorded. RESULTS: Although the image noise of perfusion CT was higher than that of C-CT and the overall image quality of perfusion CT was lower than that of C-CT, the arterial visualisation score of perfusion CT was significantly higher than that of C-CT. The CMJ sharpness scores of the two techniques were equivalent. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were also equivalent with respect to tumour detection. The CNRs of both the left and right renal arteries were significantly higher on perfusion CT than on C-CT. The CTDI, DLP, and SSDE of perfusion CT were significantly lower than those of C-CT. CONCLUSION: Perfusion CT using low-dose contrast agent preserved arterial visualisation and the tumour detection rate and achieved a low radiation dose despite image quality degradation and image noise.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)650.e13-650.e18
ジャーナルClinical Radiology
74
発行部数8
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 8 1 2019

Fingerprint

Contrast Media
Perfusion
Tomography
Radiation
Kidney
Renal Artery
Noise
Neoplasms
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Information Storage and Retrieval

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

これを引用

Image quality and radiation dose of renal perfusion CT with low-dose contrast agent : a comparison with conventional CT using a 320-row system. / Asayama, Yoshiki; Nishie, Akihiro; Ishigami, K.; ushijima, yasuhiro; Kakihara, Daisuke; Fujita, N.; Morita, K.; Ishimatsu, K.; Takao, S.; Honda, Hiroshi.

:: Clinical Radiology, 巻 74, 番号 8, 01.08.2019, p. 650.e13-650.e18.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

Asayama, Yoshiki ; Nishie, Akihiro ; Ishigami, K. ; ushijima, yasuhiro ; Kakihara, Daisuke ; Fujita, N. ; Morita, K. ; Ishimatsu, K. ; Takao, S. ; Honda, Hiroshi. / Image quality and radiation dose of renal perfusion CT with low-dose contrast agent : a comparison with conventional CT using a 320-row system. :: Clinical Radiology. 2019 ; 巻 74, 番号 8. pp. 650.e13-650.e18.
@article{2b260b9019604e6cb3d00142a8f928c9,
title = "Image quality and radiation dose of renal perfusion CT with low-dose contrast agent: a comparison with conventional CT using a 320-row system",
abstract = "AIM: To compare perfusion computed tomography (CT) with reconstructed image from source data using low-dose contrast agent and conventional 320-row CT for the evaluation of renal tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent conventional CT (C-CT) and 26 patients underwent perfusion CT with low-dose (40 ml) contrast agent. Image noise, arterial visualisation, the sharpness of the corticomedullary junction (CMJ), and overall image quality were each assessed using a four-point scale. The tumour detection rate for lesions <4 cm (n=66) was also evaluated. Quantitative image parameters including image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the renal artery and CMJ were measured. The volume CT dose index (CTDI), dose–length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were also recorded. RESULTS: Although the image noise of perfusion CT was higher than that of C-CT and the overall image quality of perfusion CT was lower than that of C-CT, the arterial visualisation score of perfusion CT was significantly higher than that of C-CT. The CMJ sharpness scores of the two techniques were equivalent. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were also equivalent with respect to tumour detection. The CNRs of both the left and right renal arteries were significantly higher on perfusion CT than on C-CT. The CTDI, DLP, and SSDE of perfusion CT were significantly lower than those of C-CT. CONCLUSION: Perfusion CT using low-dose contrast agent preserved arterial visualisation and the tumour detection rate and achieved a low radiation dose despite image quality degradation and image noise.",
author = "Yoshiki Asayama and Akihiro Nishie and K. Ishigami and yasuhiro ushijima and Daisuke Kakihara and N. Fujita and K. Morita and K. Ishimatsu and S. Takao and Hiroshi Honda",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.017",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "650.e13--650.e18",
journal = "Clinical Radiology",
issn = "0009-9260",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image quality and radiation dose of renal perfusion CT with low-dose contrast agent

T2 - a comparison with conventional CT using a 320-row system

AU - Asayama, Yoshiki

AU - Nishie, Akihiro

AU - Ishigami, K.

AU - ushijima, yasuhiro

AU - Kakihara, Daisuke

AU - Fujita, N.

AU - Morita, K.

AU - Ishimatsu, K.

AU - Takao, S.

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - AIM: To compare perfusion computed tomography (CT) with reconstructed image from source data using low-dose contrast agent and conventional 320-row CT for the evaluation of renal tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent conventional CT (C-CT) and 26 patients underwent perfusion CT with low-dose (40 ml) contrast agent. Image noise, arterial visualisation, the sharpness of the corticomedullary junction (CMJ), and overall image quality were each assessed using a four-point scale. The tumour detection rate for lesions <4 cm (n=66) was also evaluated. Quantitative image parameters including image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the renal artery and CMJ were measured. The volume CT dose index (CTDI), dose–length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were also recorded. RESULTS: Although the image noise of perfusion CT was higher than that of C-CT and the overall image quality of perfusion CT was lower than that of C-CT, the arterial visualisation score of perfusion CT was significantly higher than that of C-CT. The CMJ sharpness scores of the two techniques were equivalent. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were also equivalent with respect to tumour detection. The CNRs of both the left and right renal arteries were significantly higher on perfusion CT than on C-CT. The CTDI, DLP, and SSDE of perfusion CT were significantly lower than those of C-CT. CONCLUSION: Perfusion CT using low-dose contrast agent preserved arterial visualisation and the tumour detection rate and achieved a low radiation dose despite image quality degradation and image noise.

AB - AIM: To compare perfusion computed tomography (CT) with reconstructed image from source data using low-dose contrast agent and conventional 320-row CT for the evaluation of renal tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent conventional CT (C-CT) and 26 patients underwent perfusion CT with low-dose (40 ml) contrast agent. Image noise, arterial visualisation, the sharpness of the corticomedullary junction (CMJ), and overall image quality were each assessed using a four-point scale. The tumour detection rate for lesions <4 cm (n=66) was also evaluated. Quantitative image parameters including image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the renal artery and CMJ were measured. The volume CT dose index (CTDI), dose–length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were also recorded. RESULTS: Although the image noise of perfusion CT was higher than that of C-CT and the overall image quality of perfusion CT was lower than that of C-CT, the arterial visualisation score of perfusion CT was significantly higher than that of C-CT. The CMJ sharpness scores of the two techniques were equivalent. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were also equivalent with respect to tumour detection. The CNRs of both the left and right renal arteries were significantly higher on perfusion CT than on C-CT. The CTDI, DLP, and SSDE of perfusion CT were significantly lower than those of C-CT. CONCLUSION: Perfusion CT using low-dose contrast agent preserved arterial visualisation and the tumour detection rate and achieved a low radiation dose despite image quality degradation and image noise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064466722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064466722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 31014571

AN - SCOPUS:85064466722

VL - 74

SP - 650.e13-650.e18

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

SN - 0009-9260

IS - 8

ER -