TY - JOUR
T1 - Intercomparison between a single particle soot photometer and evolved gas analysis in an industrial area in Japan
T2 - Implications for the consistency of soot aerosol mass concentration measurements
AU - Miyakawa, T.
AU - Kanaya, Y.
AU - Komazaki, Y.
AU - Taketani, F.
AU - Pan, X.
AU - Irwin, M.
AU - Symonds, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank N. Moteki at the University of Tokyo for assistance with the SP2 laboratory experiments, and S. Shimizu at Tsukasa Sokken Co., Ltd. for assistance with CPMA operations at JAMSTEC. We are also grateful to G. McMeeking at Droplet Measurement Technologies Inc. and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive reviews. K. Uematsu at Marine Works Japan LTD. is appreciated for technical assistance in the individual particle analysis of aerosols. The water suspension of Aquadag particles was provided by Droplet Measurement Technologies Inc. This study was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund ( 2-1403 ) of the Ministry of Environment, Japan, and partially carried out in the Arctic Challenge for Sustainability (ArCS) Project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Mass concentrations of soot (typically comprising black and elemental carbon; BC and EC, respectively) aerosols, were measured at Yokosuka city, an industrial region in Japan in the early summer of 2014. The results of laser-induced incandescence (LII) and evolved gas analysis (EGA) techniques were compared using a single particle soot photometer (SP2) and semi-continuous elemental/organic carbon analyzer (EC/OC analyzer), respectively. We revisited the procedure of SP2 calibration with a focus on investigating the relationship between LII intensity (SLII) and refractory BC (rBC) mass per particle (mPP) for some BC-proxies in the laboratory, as well as for ambient rBC particles in order to discuss the uncertainty of the SP2. It was found that the mPP-SLII for the fullerene soot and carbon black particles agreed well within 3% and 10%, respectively, with that for ambient rBC particles. This is the first time to suggest the use of carbon black as a reference material. We also found that the mPP-SLII for the aqueous deflocculated Acheson graphite particles with the correction factor given by Baumgardner et al. (2012) was still biased by around +20% to that for ambient rBC particles. EC quantified by the semi-continuous EC/OC analyzer using a thermal-protocol similar to that of Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE-like), systematically showed higher concentrations than rBC measured by the SP2. The uncertainties related to SP2 cannot fully account for this difference. This result was likely caused by the contribution of charred organic materials to EC, which can be affected significantly by thermal-protocols for the EGA. The consistency and differences between rBC and EC are discussed with regard to comparing their respective mass concentrations.
AB - Mass concentrations of soot (typically comprising black and elemental carbon; BC and EC, respectively) aerosols, were measured at Yokosuka city, an industrial region in Japan in the early summer of 2014. The results of laser-induced incandescence (LII) and evolved gas analysis (EGA) techniques were compared using a single particle soot photometer (SP2) and semi-continuous elemental/organic carbon analyzer (EC/OC analyzer), respectively. We revisited the procedure of SP2 calibration with a focus on investigating the relationship between LII intensity (SLII) and refractory BC (rBC) mass per particle (mPP) for some BC-proxies in the laboratory, as well as for ambient rBC particles in order to discuss the uncertainty of the SP2. It was found that the mPP-SLII for the fullerene soot and carbon black particles agreed well within 3% and 10%, respectively, with that for ambient rBC particles. This is the first time to suggest the use of carbon black as a reference material. We also found that the mPP-SLII for the aqueous deflocculated Acheson graphite particles with the correction factor given by Baumgardner et al. (2012) was still biased by around +20% to that for ambient rBC particles. EC quantified by the semi-continuous EC/OC analyzer using a thermal-protocol similar to that of Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE-like), systematically showed higher concentrations than rBC measured by the SP2. The uncertainties related to SP2 cannot fully account for this difference. This result was likely caused by the contribution of charred organic materials to EC, which can be affected significantly by thermal-protocols for the EGA. The consistency and differences between rBC and EC are discussed with regard to comparing their respective mass concentrations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954115641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954115641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.018
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954115641
SN - 1352-2310
VL - 127
SP - 14
EP - 21
JO - Atmospheric Environment
JF - Atmospheric Environment
ER -