Low positive airway pressure without positive end-expiratory pressure decreases blood loss during hepatectomy in living liver donors

Tomohiro Iguchi, Toru Ikegami, Tetsuhiro Fujiyoshi, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Ken Shirabe, Yoshihiko Maehara

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

1 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Background/Aims: Despite the development of strategies to minimize blood loss during hepatectomy challenges remain. Our aim was to determine whether low positive airway pressure (PAP) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could minimize blood loss during hepatectomy. Methods: Forty-one living liver donors who underwent extended left lobectomy or right lobectomy between December 2012 and November 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. In the standard PAP group (n = 18), tidal volume was 8-10 ml/kg, respiratory rate was 10-12/min and PEEP was maintained at 5 cm H 2 O. In the low PAP group (n = 23), tidal volume was reduced to 5 ml/kg, respiratory rate was increased to 15/min and PEEP maintained at 0 cm H 2 O. Low central venous pressure (CVP) was maintained during surgery in all cases. Results: The low PAP group had significantly less blood loss (p = 0.0075) and shorter operation time (p = 0.0303) than the standard PAP group. In multiple regression analysis, ventilation mode and median CVP were found to be determining factors for blood loss. In no case did the ventilation mode affect perioperative management. Conclusions: Low PAP without PEEP is a safe mechanical ventilation mode that might help minimize blood loss along with CVP monitoring during hepatectomy.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)192-196
ページ数5
ジャーナルDigestive surgery
34
発行部数3
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 4 1 2017

Fingerprint

Positive-Pressure Respiration
Living Donors
Hepatectomy
Pressure
Central Venous Pressure
Liver
Tidal Volume
Respiratory Rate
Artificial Respiration
Ventilation
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

これを引用

Low positive airway pressure without positive end-expiratory pressure decreases blood loss during hepatectomy in living liver donors. / Iguchi, Tomohiro; Ikegami, Toru; Fujiyoshi, Tetsuhiro; Yoshizumi, Tomoharu; Shirabe, Ken; Maehara, Yoshihiko.

:: Digestive surgery, 巻 34, 番号 3, 01.04.2017, p. 192-196.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

@article{37db111478ff4c4886f4e7f32e978a83,
title = "Low positive airway pressure without positive end-expiratory pressure decreases blood loss during hepatectomy in living liver donors",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Despite the development of strategies to minimize blood loss during hepatectomy challenges remain. Our aim was to determine whether low positive airway pressure (PAP) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could minimize blood loss during hepatectomy. Methods: Forty-one living liver donors who underwent extended left lobectomy or right lobectomy between December 2012 and November 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. In the standard PAP group (n = 18), tidal volume was 8-10 ml/kg, respiratory rate was 10-12/min and PEEP was maintained at 5 cm H 2 O. In the low PAP group (n = 23), tidal volume was reduced to 5 ml/kg, respiratory rate was increased to 15/min and PEEP maintained at 0 cm H 2 O. Low central venous pressure (CVP) was maintained during surgery in all cases. Results: The low PAP group had significantly less blood loss (p = 0.0075) and shorter operation time (p = 0.0303) than the standard PAP group. In multiple regression analysis, ventilation mode and median CVP were found to be determining factors for blood loss. In no case did the ventilation mode affect perioperative management. Conclusions: Low PAP without PEEP is a safe mechanical ventilation mode that might help minimize blood loss along with CVP monitoring during hepatectomy.",
author = "Tomohiro Iguchi and Toru Ikegami and Tetsuhiro Fujiyoshi and Tomoharu Yoshizumi and Ken Shirabe and Yoshihiko Maehara",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000447755",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "192--196",
journal = "Digestive Surgery",
issn = "0253-4886",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low positive airway pressure without positive end-expiratory pressure decreases blood loss during hepatectomy in living liver donors

AU - Iguchi, Tomohiro

AU - Ikegami, Toru

AU - Fujiyoshi, Tetsuhiro

AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu

AU - Shirabe, Ken

AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Background/Aims: Despite the development of strategies to minimize blood loss during hepatectomy challenges remain. Our aim was to determine whether low positive airway pressure (PAP) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could minimize blood loss during hepatectomy. Methods: Forty-one living liver donors who underwent extended left lobectomy or right lobectomy between December 2012 and November 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. In the standard PAP group (n = 18), tidal volume was 8-10 ml/kg, respiratory rate was 10-12/min and PEEP was maintained at 5 cm H 2 O. In the low PAP group (n = 23), tidal volume was reduced to 5 ml/kg, respiratory rate was increased to 15/min and PEEP maintained at 0 cm H 2 O. Low central venous pressure (CVP) was maintained during surgery in all cases. Results: The low PAP group had significantly less blood loss (p = 0.0075) and shorter operation time (p = 0.0303) than the standard PAP group. In multiple regression analysis, ventilation mode and median CVP were found to be determining factors for blood loss. In no case did the ventilation mode affect perioperative management. Conclusions: Low PAP without PEEP is a safe mechanical ventilation mode that might help minimize blood loss along with CVP monitoring during hepatectomy.

AB - Background/Aims: Despite the development of strategies to minimize blood loss during hepatectomy challenges remain. Our aim was to determine whether low positive airway pressure (PAP) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could minimize blood loss during hepatectomy. Methods: Forty-one living liver donors who underwent extended left lobectomy or right lobectomy between December 2012 and November 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. In the standard PAP group (n = 18), tidal volume was 8-10 ml/kg, respiratory rate was 10-12/min and PEEP was maintained at 5 cm H 2 O. In the low PAP group (n = 23), tidal volume was reduced to 5 ml/kg, respiratory rate was increased to 15/min and PEEP maintained at 0 cm H 2 O. Low central venous pressure (CVP) was maintained during surgery in all cases. Results: The low PAP group had significantly less blood loss (p = 0.0075) and shorter operation time (p = 0.0303) than the standard PAP group. In multiple regression analysis, ventilation mode and median CVP were found to be determining factors for blood loss. In no case did the ventilation mode affect perioperative management. Conclusions: Low PAP without PEEP is a safe mechanical ventilation mode that might help minimize blood loss along with CVP monitoring during hepatectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006298255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006298255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000447755

DO - 10.1159/000447755

M3 - Article

C2 - 27931033

AN - SCOPUS:85006298255

VL - 34

SP - 192

EP - 196

JO - Digestive Surgery

JF - Digestive Surgery

SN - 0253-4886

IS - 3

ER -