TY - JOUR
T1 - Low visceral fat content is a negative predictive marker for bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Miyamoto, Yuji
AU - Oki, Eiji
AU - Emi, Yasunori
AU - Tokunaga, Shoji
AU - Shimokawa, Mototsugu
AU - Ogata, Yutaka
AU - Akagi, Yoshito
AU - Sakamoto, Yasuo
AU - Tanaka, Takaho
AU - Saeki, Hiroshi
AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko
AU - Baba, Hideo
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Aim: This study aimed to clarify the predictive impact of visceral fat on response to bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods: Pretreatment computed tomography was used to measure visceral fat area (VFA) and patients with mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab were divided by median VFA value into two groups: high VFA and low VFA. Results: In the bevacizumab-treated group, patients with low VFA had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than patients with high VFA in univariate (median=21.1 vs. 38.9 months; hazard ratio=1.70, 95% confidence interval=1.06-2.70, p=0.03) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio=1.85, 95% confidence interval=1.15-3.03, p=0.01). No significant differences were seen in OS between groups treated with chemotherapy alone. The VFA had a marginally significant modifying effect on the relationship between bevacizumab and OS (p for interaction=0.07). Conclusion: Our findings provide the first evidence that a low VFA might be a negative predictive marker for response to bevacizumab in patients with mCRC.
AB - Aim: This study aimed to clarify the predictive impact of visceral fat on response to bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods: Pretreatment computed tomography was used to measure visceral fat area (VFA) and patients with mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab were divided by median VFA value into two groups: high VFA and low VFA. Results: In the bevacizumab-treated group, patients with low VFA had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than patients with high VFA in univariate (median=21.1 vs. 38.9 months; hazard ratio=1.70, 95% confidence interval=1.06-2.70, p=0.03) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio=1.85, 95% confidence interval=1.15-3.03, p=0.01). No significant differences were seen in OS between groups treated with chemotherapy alone. The VFA had a marginally significant modifying effect on the relationship between bevacizumab and OS (p for interaction=0.07). Conclusion: Our findings provide the first evidence that a low VFA might be a negative predictive marker for response to bevacizumab in patients with mCRC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039776219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039776219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21873/anticanres.12249
DO - 10.21873/anticanres.12249
M3 - Article
C2 - 29277814
AN - SCOPUS:85039776219
VL - 38
SP - 491
EP - 499
JO - Anticancer Research
JF - Anticancer Research
SN - 0250-7005
IS - 1
ER -