TY - JOUR
T1 - Maximum acceptable communication delay for the realization of telesurgery
AU - Nankaku, Akitoshi
AU - Tokunaga, Masanori
AU - Yonezawa, Hiroki
AU - Kanno, Takahiro
AU - Kawashima, Kenji
AU - Hakamada, Kenichi
AU - Hirano, Satoshi
AU - Oki, Eiji
AU - Mori, Masaki
AU - Kinugasa, Yusuke
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the work of past and present members of our laboratory. We are also grateful to the staffs of Riverfield Inc. for collaboration in the early stages of this work. They kindly provided the surgical assist robot.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Nankaku et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Aim To determine acceptable limits of communication delays in telesurgery, we investigated the impact of communication delays under a dynamic environment using a surgical assist robot. Previous studies have evaluated acceptable delays under static environments. Effects of delays may be enhanced in dynamic environments, but studies have not yet focused on this point. Methods Thirty-four subjects with different surgical experience (Group1: no surgical experience; Group2: only laparoscopic surgical experience; Group3: robotic surgery experience) performed 4 tasks under different delays (0, 70, 100, 150, 200, or 300 ms) using a surgical assist robot. Task accomplishment time and total movement distance of forceps were recorded and compared under different communication delays of 0–300 ms. In addition, surgical performance was compared between Group1or Group2 without delay and Group3 with communication delays. Results Significant differences in task accomplishment time were found between delays of 0 and 70 ms, but not between delays of 70 and 100 ms. Thereafter, the greater the communication delay, the longer the task accomplishment time. Similar results were obtained in total movement distance of forceps. Comparisons between Group3 with delay and Group1 or Group2 without delay demonstrated that surgical performance in Group3 with delay was superior or equal to that of Group1 or Group2 without delay as long as the delay was 100 ms or less. Conclusions Communication delays in telesurgery may be acceptable if 100 ms or less. Experienced surgeons with more than 100 ms of delay could outperform less-experienced surgeons without delay.
AB - Aim To determine acceptable limits of communication delays in telesurgery, we investigated the impact of communication delays under a dynamic environment using a surgical assist robot. Previous studies have evaluated acceptable delays under static environments. Effects of delays may be enhanced in dynamic environments, but studies have not yet focused on this point. Methods Thirty-four subjects with different surgical experience (Group1: no surgical experience; Group2: only laparoscopic surgical experience; Group3: robotic surgery experience) performed 4 tasks under different delays (0, 70, 100, 150, 200, or 300 ms) using a surgical assist robot. Task accomplishment time and total movement distance of forceps were recorded and compared under different communication delays of 0–300 ms. In addition, surgical performance was compared between Group1or Group2 without delay and Group3 with communication delays. Results Significant differences in task accomplishment time were found between delays of 0 and 70 ms, but not between delays of 70 and 100 ms. Thereafter, the greater the communication delay, the longer the task accomplishment time. Similar results were obtained in total movement distance of forceps. Comparisons between Group3 with delay and Group1 or Group2 without delay demonstrated that surgical performance in Group3 with delay was superior or equal to that of Group1 or Group2 without delay as long as the delay was 100 ms or less. Conclusions Communication delays in telesurgery may be acceptable if 100 ms or less. Experienced surgeons with more than 100 ms of delay could outperform less-experienced surgeons without delay.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139379453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139379453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0274328
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0274328
M3 - Article
C2 - 36201429
AN - SCOPUS:85139379453
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 10 October
M1 - e0274328
ER -