Multifunctionality of ‘after all’: A unitary account

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

抄録

This article attempts to establish a relevance-theoretic account of the multifunctionality of the English discourse connective after all. First, this article proposes a revision of the constraint imposed by after all on the interpretation of the utterance in which it occurs and, second, presents a unitary account of its multifunctions. In the unitary account, the procedural information of the connective instructs the addressee to construct a context in which certain evidence resolves a contradiction between previous assumption and conclusion. Another aim of the article is to demonstrate that the unitary account elucidates the well-known but little investigated puzzle that after all occurs in the context of concession and justification. The proposed unitary account also helps facilitate the argument that both concession and justification share a context of interpretation involving three assumptions: previous assumption, evidence and conclusion. This argument implies that after all imposes a constraint on the selection of the context, and the different context types lead to the multiple uses of after all along with different cognitive effects.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)102-112
ページ数11
ジャーナルJournal of Pragmatics
134
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 9 1 2018

Fingerprint

concession
interpretation
evidence
discourse
Multifunctionality
Justification
Concession

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

これを引用

Multifunctionality of ‘after all’ : A unitary account. / Otsu, Takahiro.

:: Journal of Pragmatics, 巻 134, 01.09.2018, p. 102-112.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

@article{024a7132a0ee4098a7651373be566889,
title = "Multifunctionality of ‘after all’: A unitary account",
abstract = "This article attempts to establish a relevance-theoretic account of the multifunctionality of the English discourse connective after all. First, this article proposes a revision of the constraint imposed by after all on the interpretation of the utterance in which it occurs and, second, presents a unitary account of its multifunctions. In the unitary account, the procedural information of the connective instructs the addressee to construct a context in which certain evidence resolves a contradiction between previous assumption and conclusion. Another aim of the article is to demonstrate that the unitary account elucidates the well-known but little investigated puzzle that after all occurs in the context of concession and justification. The proposed unitary account also helps facilitate the argument that both concession and justification share a context of interpretation involving three assumptions: previous assumption, evidence and conclusion. This argument implies that after all imposes a constraint on the selection of the context, and the different context types lead to the multiple uses of after all along with different cognitive effects.",
author = "Takahiro Otsu",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.007",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "102--112",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multifunctionality of ‘after all’

T2 - A unitary account

AU - Otsu, Takahiro

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - This article attempts to establish a relevance-theoretic account of the multifunctionality of the English discourse connective after all. First, this article proposes a revision of the constraint imposed by after all on the interpretation of the utterance in which it occurs and, second, presents a unitary account of its multifunctions. In the unitary account, the procedural information of the connective instructs the addressee to construct a context in which certain evidence resolves a contradiction between previous assumption and conclusion. Another aim of the article is to demonstrate that the unitary account elucidates the well-known but little investigated puzzle that after all occurs in the context of concession and justification. The proposed unitary account also helps facilitate the argument that both concession and justification share a context of interpretation involving three assumptions: previous assumption, evidence and conclusion. This argument implies that after all imposes a constraint on the selection of the context, and the different context types lead to the multiple uses of after all along with different cognitive effects.

AB - This article attempts to establish a relevance-theoretic account of the multifunctionality of the English discourse connective after all. First, this article proposes a revision of the constraint imposed by after all on the interpretation of the utterance in which it occurs and, second, presents a unitary account of its multifunctions. In the unitary account, the procedural information of the connective instructs the addressee to construct a context in which certain evidence resolves a contradiction between previous assumption and conclusion. Another aim of the article is to demonstrate that the unitary account elucidates the well-known but little investigated puzzle that after all occurs in the context of concession and justification. The proposed unitary account also helps facilitate the argument that both concession and justification share a context of interpretation involving three assumptions: previous assumption, evidence and conclusion. This argument implies that after all imposes a constraint on the selection of the context, and the different context types lead to the multiple uses of after all along with different cognitive effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050151289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050151289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050151289

VL - 134

SP - 102

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -