Norm composition of tolerant solidarity

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

抄録

In this paper we formally discuss the mechanism of solidarity from the viewpoint of tolerance and norm. Defining solidarity as via net-base symbols, we formalize believes that specify what symbols are required for in terms of Boolean equations. Tolerant solidarity is confronted with contradictory relationship between universalism and relativism. In this case "less conflictual solutions" (LCS: Murakami,1994) will be an excellent guide for tolerance when we define it as restriction of norm activation. In addition, when we consider meta-believes that represent ideas like liberal nationalism (liberal universalism), LCS works as the standard of tolerance in the acceptance process of meta-believes. Through the above-mentioned analysis, we will discuss two issues. At first, believes show different level of tolerance from the viewpoint of LCS, and the most tolerant belief is different according to positioning of actors. Then, belief-switching should have rich implication to realize tolerant solidarity. Secondly, LCS does not guarantee that liberal universalism is the most tolerant meta-belief; however, it might best fit with tolerant solidarity because it holds moderate tolerance and a consistent ideal goal at the same time. Thus, we will suggest relation-epistemological micro-macro link in order to explain the mechanism of solidarity and norms.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)257-270
ページ数14
ジャーナルSociological Theory and Methods
32
発行部数2
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 1 1 2017

Fingerprint

solidarity
tolerance
universalism
symbol
relativism
activation
nationalism
guarantee
acceptance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

これを引用

Norm composition of tolerant solidarity. / Misumi, Kazuto.

:: Sociological Theory and Methods, 巻 32, 番号 2, 01.01.2017, p. 257-270.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

@article{39d688e9a6274af682e7823c9d0896fb,
title = "Norm composition of tolerant solidarity",
abstract = "In this paper we formally discuss the mechanism of solidarity from the viewpoint of tolerance and norm. Defining solidarity as via net-base symbols, we formalize believes that specify what symbols are required for in terms of Boolean equations. Tolerant solidarity is confronted with contradictory relationship between universalism and relativism. In this case {"}less conflictual solutions{"} (LCS: Murakami,1994) will be an excellent guide for tolerance when we define it as restriction of norm activation. In addition, when we consider meta-believes that represent ideas like liberal nationalism (liberal universalism), LCS works as the standard of tolerance in the acceptance process of meta-believes. Through the above-mentioned analysis, we will discuss two issues. At first, believes show different level of tolerance from the viewpoint of LCS, and the most tolerant belief is different according to positioning of actors. Then, belief-switching should have rich implication to realize tolerant solidarity. Secondly, LCS does not guarantee that liberal universalism is the most tolerant meta-belief; however, it might best fit with tolerant solidarity because it holds moderate tolerance and a consistent ideal goal at the same time. Thus, we will suggest relation-epistemological micro-macro link in order to explain the mechanism of solidarity and norms.",
author = "Kazuto Misumi",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11218/ojjams.32.257",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "257--270",
journal = "Sociological Theory and Methods",
issn = "0913-1442",
publisher = "Japanese Association For Mathematical Sociology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Norm composition of tolerant solidarity

AU - Misumi, Kazuto

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In this paper we formally discuss the mechanism of solidarity from the viewpoint of tolerance and norm. Defining solidarity as via net-base symbols, we formalize believes that specify what symbols are required for in terms of Boolean equations. Tolerant solidarity is confronted with contradictory relationship between universalism and relativism. In this case "less conflictual solutions" (LCS: Murakami,1994) will be an excellent guide for tolerance when we define it as restriction of norm activation. In addition, when we consider meta-believes that represent ideas like liberal nationalism (liberal universalism), LCS works as the standard of tolerance in the acceptance process of meta-believes. Through the above-mentioned analysis, we will discuss two issues. At first, believes show different level of tolerance from the viewpoint of LCS, and the most tolerant belief is different according to positioning of actors. Then, belief-switching should have rich implication to realize tolerant solidarity. Secondly, LCS does not guarantee that liberal universalism is the most tolerant meta-belief; however, it might best fit with tolerant solidarity because it holds moderate tolerance and a consistent ideal goal at the same time. Thus, we will suggest relation-epistemological micro-macro link in order to explain the mechanism of solidarity and norms.

AB - In this paper we formally discuss the mechanism of solidarity from the viewpoint of tolerance and norm. Defining solidarity as via net-base symbols, we formalize believes that specify what symbols are required for in terms of Boolean equations. Tolerant solidarity is confronted with contradictory relationship between universalism and relativism. In this case "less conflictual solutions" (LCS: Murakami,1994) will be an excellent guide for tolerance when we define it as restriction of norm activation. In addition, when we consider meta-believes that represent ideas like liberal nationalism (liberal universalism), LCS works as the standard of tolerance in the acceptance process of meta-believes. Through the above-mentioned analysis, we will discuss two issues. At first, believes show different level of tolerance from the viewpoint of LCS, and the most tolerant belief is different according to positioning of actors. Then, belief-switching should have rich implication to realize tolerant solidarity. Secondly, LCS does not guarantee that liberal universalism is the most tolerant meta-belief; however, it might best fit with tolerant solidarity because it holds moderate tolerance and a consistent ideal goal at the same time. Thus, we will suggest relation-epistemological micro-macro link in order to explain the mechanism of solidarity and norms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045221351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045221351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11218/ojjams.32.257

DO - 10.11218/ojjams.32.257

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045221351

VL - 32

SP - 257

EP - 270

JO - Sociological Theory and Methods

JF - Sociological Theory and Methods

SN - 0913-1442

IS - 2

ER -