Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9-14, 2005 - Comparison with IRI model

M. V. Klimenko, V. V. Klimenko, K. G. Ratovsky, Larisa Petrovna Goncharenko

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

16 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

This study presents the modeling of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of September 9-14, 2005. We examine the performance of the Global Self-Consistent Model of Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) and International Reference Ionosphere-2000 (IRI-2000), and compare the modeling predictions with the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar observations over Yakutsk, Irkutsk, Millstone Hill and Arecibo stations. IRI-2000 predicted well all negative f0F2 disturbances. In comparison with IRI-2000, the GSM TIP better reproduced the positive phase observed during the disturbed times. We discuss the possible reasons of the differences between the GSM TIP model calculations, IRI predictions, and the observations.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)433-440
ページ数8
ジャーナルearth, planets and space
64
発行部数6
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 1 1 2012

Fingerprint

ionospherics
ionospheres
ionosphere
thermosphere
modeling
incoherent scatter radar
ionosondes
radar tracking
geomagnetic storm
magnetic storms
prediction
predictions
effect
comparison
disturbances
stations
radar
disturbance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geology
  • Space and Planetary Science

これを引用

Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9-14, 2005 - Comparison with IRI model. / Klimenko, M. V.; Klimenko, V. V.; Ratovsky, K. G.; Goncharenko, Larisa Petrovna.

:: earth, planets and space, 巻 64, 番号 6, 01.01.2012, p. 433-440.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

Klimenko, M. V. ; Klimenko, V. V. ; Ratovsky, K. G. ; Goncharenko, Larisa Petrovna. / Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9-14, 2005 - Comparison with IRI model. :: earth, planets and space. 2012 ; 巻 64, 番号 6. pp. 433-440.
@article{9e4dfeb4640048879506dec9c87186d8,
title = "Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9-14, 2005 - Comparison with IRI model",
abstract = "This study presents the modeling of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of September 9-14, 2005. We examine the performance of the Global Self-Consistent Model of Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) and International Reference Ionosphere-2000 (IRI-2000), and compare the modeling predictions with the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar observations over Yakutsk, Irkutsk, Millstone Hill and Arecibo stations. IRI-2000 predicted well all negative f0F2 disturbances. In comparison with IRI-2000, the GSM TIP better reproduced the positive phase observed during the disturbed times. We discuss the possible reasons of the differences between the GSM TIP model calculations, IRI predictions, and the observations.",
author = "Klimenko, {M. V.} and Klimenko, {V. V.} and Ratovsky, {K. G.} and Goncharenko, {Larisa Petrovna}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5047/eps.2011.06.048",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "433--440",
journal = "Earth, Planets and Space",
issn = "1343-8832",
publisher = "Terra Scientific Publishing Company",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9-14, 2005 - Comparison with IRI model

AU - Klimenko, M. V.

AU - Klimenko, V. V.

AU - Ratovsky, K. G.

AU - Goncharenko, Larisa Petrovna

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - This study presents the modeling of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of September 9-14, 2005. We examine the performance of the Global Self-Consistent Model of Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) and International Reference Ionosphere-2000 (IRI-2000), and compare the modeling predictions with the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar observations over Yakutsk, Irkutsk, Millstone Hill and Arecibo stations. IRI-2000 predicted well all negative f0F2 disturbances. In comparison with IRI-2000, the GSM TIP better reproduced the positive phase observed during the disturbed times. We discuss the possible reasons of the differences between the GSM TIP model calculations, IRI predictions, and the observations.

AB - This study presents the modeling of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of September 9-14, 2005. We examine the performance of the Global Self-Consistent Model of Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) and International Reference Ionosphere-2000 (IRI-2000), and compare the modeling predictions with the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar observations over Yakutsk, Irkutsk, Millstone Hill and Arecibo stations. IRI-2000 predicted well all negative f0F2 disturbances. In comparison with IRI-2000, the GSM TIP better reproduced the positive phase observed during the disturbed times. We discuss the possible reasons of the differences between the GSM TIP model calculations, IRI predictions, and the observations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876400373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876400373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5047/eps.2011.06.048

DO - 10.5047/eps.2011.06.048

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 433

EP - 440

JO - Earth, Planets and Space

JF - Earth, Planets and Space

SN - 1343-8832

IS - 6

ER -