TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of long-term nivolumab and subsequent chemotherapy in Japanese patients with head and neck cancer
T2 - 2-year follow-up from a multicenter real-world study
AU - Yasumatsu, Ryuji
AU - Shimizu, Yasushi
AU - Hanai, Nobuhiro
AU - Kariya, Shin
AU - Yokota, Tomoya
AU - Fujii, Takashi
AU - Tsukahara, Kiyoaki
AU - Ando, Mizuo
AU - Hanyu, Kenji
AU - Ueda, Tsutomu
AU - Hirakawa, Hitoshi
AU - Takahashi, Shunji
AU - Ono, Takeharu
AU - Sano, Daisuke
AU - Yamauchi, Moriyasu
AU - Watanabe, Akihito
AU - Omori, Koichi
AU - Yamazaki, Tomoko
AU - Monden, Nobuya
AU - Kudo, Naomi
AU - Arai, Makoto
AU - Yonekura, Syuji
AU - Asakage, Takahiro
AU - Nekado, Takahiro
AU - Yamada, Takayuki
AU - Homma, Akihiro
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Mebix (Tokyo, Japan) for operation of the study and statistical analysis in their role as the contract research organization, which was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K. and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The authors also thank Deepali Garg, MBBS, PGDHA, of Cactus Life Sciences (part of Cactus Communications, Mumbai, India) for providing medical writing support, which was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K. and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: We have previously reported the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Here, we report long-term outcomes from this study in the overall population and subgroups stratified by subsequent chemotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective observational study, Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNC receiving nivolumab were followed up for 2 years. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and PFS rate. Safety endpoints included the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: Overall, 256 patients received a median of 6.0 doses (range: 1–52) of nivolumab over a median duration of 72.5 days (range: 1–736). Median OS was 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2–12.0] and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8–2.7). A significant difference between 2-year survivors (n = 62) and non-2-year survivors was observed by median age (P = 0.0227) and ECOG PS (P = 0.0001). Of 95 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 54.7% received paclitaxel ± cetuximab. The median OS and PFS from the start of paclitaxel ± cetuximab were 6.9 months (95% CI 5.9–11.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.3–5.5), respectively. IrAEs were reported in 17.2% of patients. Endocrine (7.0%) and lung (4.3%) disorders were the most common irAEs; kidney disorder (n = 1) was newly identified in this follow-up analysis. Conclusions: Results demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab and potential effectiveness of subsequent chemotherapy in patients with R/M HNC in the real-world setting. Safety was consistent with that over the 1-year follow-up.
AB - Background: We have previously reported the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Here, we report long-term outcomes from this study in the overall population and subgroups stratified by subsequent chemotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective observational study, Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNC receiving nivolumab were followed up for 2 years. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and PFS rate. Safety endpoints included the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: Overall, 256 patients received a median of 6.0 doses (range: 1–52) of nivolumab over a median duration of 72.5 days (range: 1–736). Median OS was 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2–12.0] and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8–2.7). A significant difference between 2-year survivors (n = 62) and non-2-year survivors was observed by median age (P = 0.0227) and ECOG PS (P = 0.0001). Of 95 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 54.7% received paclitaxel ± cetuximab. The median OS and PFS from the start of paclitaxel ± cetuximab were 6.9 months (95% CI 5.9–11.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.3–5.5), respectively. IrAEs were reported in 17.2% of patients. Endocrine (7.0%) and lung (4.3%) disorders were the most common irAEs; kidney disorder (n = 1) was newly identified in this follow-up analysis. Conclusions: Results demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab and potential effectiveness of subsequent chemotherapy in patients with R/M HNC in the real-world setting. Safety was consistent with that over the 1-year follow-up.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119271693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119271693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-021-02047-y
DO - 10.1007/s10147-021-02047-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 34773525
AN - SCOPUS:85119271693
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 27
SP - 95
EP - 104
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 1
ER -