Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries

Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries: Part I. Overview and rationale for patient-reported outcome measures

Ola Rolfson, Kate Eresian Chenok, Eric Bohm, Anne Lübbeke, Geke Denissen, Jennifer Dunn, Leonard Lyman Stephen, Patricia Franklin, Michael Dunbar, Søren Overgaard, Göran Garellick, Jill Dawson

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

43 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Steering Committee established the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group to convene, evaluate, and advise on best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs and to support the adoption and use of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty in registries worldwide. The 2 main types of PROMs include generic (general health) PROMs, which provide a measure of general health for any health state, and specific PROMs, which focus on specific symptoms, diseases, organs, body regions, or body functions. The establishment of a PROM instrument requires the fulfillment of methodological standards and rigorous testing to ensure that it is valid, reliable, responsive, and acceptable to the intended population. A survey of the 41 ISAR member registries showed that 8 registries administered a PROMs program that covered all elective hip or knee arthroplasty patients and 6 registries collected PROMs for sample populations; 1 other registry had planned but had not started collection of PROMs. The most common generic instruments used were the EuroQol 5 dimension health outcome survey (EQ-5D) and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12) or the similar Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12). The most common specific PROMs were the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score (UCLA).

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)3-8
ページ数6
ジャーナルActa Orthopaedica
87
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 6 15 2016

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Registries
Health Surveys
Hip
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Health
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Knee Injuries
Body Regions
Hip Osteoarthritis
Los Angeles
Knee Osteoarthritis
Ontario
Veterans
Practice Guidelines
Population
Arthritis
Knee

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

これを引用

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries : Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries: Part I. Overview and rationale for patient-reported outcome measures. / Rolfson, Ola; Eresian Chenok, Kate; Bohm, Eric; Lübbeke, Anne; Denissen, Geke; Dunn, Jennifer; Lyman Stephen, Leonard; Franklin, Patricia; Dunbar, Michael; Overgaard, Søren; Garellick, Göran; Dawson, Jill.

:: Acta Orthopaedica, 巻 87, 15.06.2016, p. 3-8.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

Rolfson, Ola ; Eresian Chenok, Kate ; Bohm, Eric ; Lübbeke, Anne ; Denissen, Geke ; Dunn, Jennifer ; Lyman Stephen, Leonard ; Franklin, Patricia ; Dunbar, Michael ; Overgaard, Søren ; Garellick, Göran ; Dawson, Jill. / Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries : Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries: Part I. Overview and rationale for patient-reported outcome measures. :: Acta Orthopaedica. 2016 ; 巻 87. pp. 3-8.
@article{df78e153339f4de28cdac6906fa8c84a,
title = "Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries: Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries: Part I. Overview and rationale for patient-reported outcome measures",
abstract = "The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Steering Committee established the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group to convene, evaluate, and advise on best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs and to support the adoption and use of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty in registries worldwide. The 2 main types of PROMs include generic (general health) PROMs, which provide a measure of general health for any health state, and specific PROMs, which focus on specific symptoms, diseases, organs, body regions, or body functions. The establishment of a PROM instrument requires the fulfillment of methodological standards and rigorous testing to ensure that it is valid, reliable, responsive, and acceptable to the intended population. A survey of the 41 ISAR member registries showed that 8 registries administered a PROMs program that covered all elective hip or knee arthroplasty patients and 6 registries collected PROMs for sample populations; 1 other registry had planned but had not started collection of PROMs. The most common generic instruments used were the EuroQol 5 dimension health outcome survey (EQ-5D) and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12) or the similar Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12). The most common specific PROMs were the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score (UCLA).",
author = "Ola Rolfson and {Eresian Chenok}, Kate and Eric Bohm and Anne L{\"u}bbeke and Geke Denissen and Jennifer Dunn and {Lyman Stephen}, Leonard and Patricia Franklin and Michael Dunbar and S{\o}ren Overgaard and G{\"o}ran Garellick and Jill Dawson",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/17453674.2016.1181815",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "3--8",
journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries

T2 - Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries: Part I. Overview and rationale for patient-reported outcome measures

AU - Rolfson, Ola

AU - Eresian Chenok, Kate

AU - Bohm, Eric

AU - Lübbeke, Anne

AU - Denissen, Geke

AU - Dunn, Jennifer

AU - Lyman Stephen, Leonard

AU - Franklin, Patricia

AU - Dunbar, Michael

AU - Overgaard, Søren

AU - Garellick, Göran

AU - Dawson, Jill

PY - 2016/6/15

Y1 - 2016/6/15

N2 - The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Steering Committee established the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group to convene, evaluate, and advise on best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs and to support the adoption and use of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty in registries worldwide. The 2 main types of PROMs include generic (general health) PROMs, which provide a measure of general health for any health state, and specific PROMs, which focus on specific symptoms, diseases, organs, body regions, or body functions. The establishment of a PROM instrument requires the fulfillment of methodological standards and rigorous testing to ensure that it is valid, reliable, responsive, and acceptable to the intended population. A survey of the 41 ISAR member registries showed that 8 registries administered a PROMs program that covered all elective hip or knee arthroplasty patients and 6 registries collected PROMs for sample populations; 1 other registry had planned but had not started collection of PROMs. The most common generic instruments used were the EuroQol 5 dimension health outcome survey (EQ-5D) and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12) or the similar Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12). The most common specific PROMs were the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score (UCLA).

AB - The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Steering Committee established the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group to convene, evaluate, and advise on best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs and to support the adoption and use of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty in registries worldwide. The 2 main types of PROMs include generic (general health) PROMs, which provide a measure of general health for any health state, and specific PROMs, which focus on specific symptoms, diseases, organs, body regions, or body functions. The establishment of a PROM instrument requires the fulfillment of methodological standards and rigorous testing to ensure that it is valid, reliable, responsive, and acceptable to the intended population. A survey of the 41 ISAR member registries showed that 8 registries administered a PROMs program that covered all elective hip or knee arthroplasty patients and 6 registries collected PROMs for sample populations; 1 other registry had planned but had not started collection of PROMs. The most common generic instruments used were the EuroQol 5 dimension health outcome survey (EQ-5D) and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12) or the similar Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12). The most common specific PROMs were the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score (UCLA).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966713050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966713050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181815

DO - 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181815

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 3

EP - 8

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3674

ER -