TY - JOUR
T1 - Preliminary feasibility study for on-site hydrogen station with distributed CO2 capture and storage system
AU - Kimura, Seiichro
AU - Honda, Kuniaki
AU - Kitamura, Keigo
AU - Taniguch, Ikuo
AU - Shitashima, Kiminori
AU - Tsuji, Takeshi
AU - Fujikawa, Shigenori
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), sponsored by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - It is important to produce Carbon-Free Hydrogen for FCV. Current Japanese situation, it is difficult to fully supply the Carbon Free Hydrogen is generated by water-electrolysis (WER) using renewable energy. This study presents the Steam reforming for natural gas (NSR) with decentralized CCS system for producing Carbon-Free Hydrogen. The CCS cost is covered by the differential cost between WER and NSR Hydrogen production cost. Our preliminary investigation suggests the differential cost between WER and NSR Hydrogen enough to cover the cost of decentralized CCS (under 1000 ton-CO2/y). We also analyze the feasibility of Mother-Daughter type of Hydrogen supplement system with decentralized CCS. In this case, NSR with CCS system has advantage against WER Hydrogen production systems. These investigations clearly indicate the high potential of NSR with CCS system but it is carefully discussion about CO2 behavior in the reservoir by well-established and newly developing methods for safety.
AB - It is important to produce Carbon-Free Hydrogen for FCV. Current Japanese situation, it is difficult to fully supply the Carbon Free Hydrogen is generated by water-electrolysis (WER) using renewable energy. This study presents the Steam reforming for natural gas (NSR) with decentralized CCS system for producing Carbon-Free Hydrogen. The CCS cost is covered by the differential cost between WER and NSR Hydrogen production cost. Our preliminary investigation suggests the differential cost between WER and NSR Hydrogen enough to cover the cost of decentralized CCS (under 1000 ton-CO2/y). We also analyze the feasibility of Mother-Daughter type of Hydrogen supplement system with decentralized CCS. In this case, NSR with CCS system has advantage against WER Hydrogen production systems. These investigations clearly indicate the high potential of NSR with CCS system but it is carefully discussion about CO2 behavior in the reservoir by well-established and newly developing methods for safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922875581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922875581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.490
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.490
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84922875581
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 63
SP - 4575
EP - 4584
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
T2 - 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014
Y2 - 5 October 2014 through 9 October 2014
ER -