TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Impact of Programmed Death-Ligand 2 Expression in Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients
AU - Takamori, Shinkichi
AU - Takada, Kazuki
AU - Azuma, Koichi
AU - Jogo, Tomoko
AU - Shimokawa, Mototsugu
AU - Toyokawa, Gouji
AU - Hirai, Fumihiko
AU - Tagawa, Tetsuzo
AU - Kawahara, Akihiko
AU - Akiba, Jun
AU - Okamoto, Isamu
AU - Nakanishi, Yoichi
AU - Oda, Yoshinao
AU - Hoshino, Tomoaki
AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2019/6/15
Y1 - 2019/6/15
N2 - Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on lung cancer cells is a prognostic marker and a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy. However, previous clinical trials have suggested that other programmed cell death 1 ligands, including programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2), might have clinical impacts. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of PD-L2 expression in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: The study included 433 patients who underwent surgical resection for lung adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2012 at Kyushu University Hospital. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The cutoff value for PD-L2 positivity was set at 1% according to a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve for 5-year survival. Results: Of the 433 patients, 306 (70.7%) were positive for PD-L2. No significant association between PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression was observed (P = 0.094). The multivariate analysis showed that the independent predictors of PD-L2 positivity were never-smoker status (P = 0.002), poor differentiation grade (P = 0.008), and advanced stage (P = 0.048). The PD-L2-positive patients had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.018) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.016). Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity were independent predictors of OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of the PD-L1-negative patients, PD-L2 positivity was significantly associated with shorter DFS (P = 0.018). Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the clinical characteristics of patients with PD-L1 expression may differ from those of patients with PD-L2 expression, and that both might contribute to poor prognoses. The potential role of PD-L2 expression as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy should be investigated in future studies.
AB - Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on lung cancer cells is a prognostic marker and a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy. However, previous clinical trials have suggested that other programmed cell death 1 ligands, including programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2), might have clinical impacts. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of PD-L2 expression in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: The study included 433 patients who underwent surgical resection for lung adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2012 at Kyushu University Hospital. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The cutoff value for PD-L2 positivity was set at 1% according to a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve for 5-year survival. Results: Of the 433 patients, 306 (70.7%) were positive for PD-L2. No significant association between PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression was observed (P = 0.094). The multivariate analysis showed that the independent predictors of PD-L2 positivity were never-smoker status (P = 0.002), poor differentiation grade (P = 0.008), and advanced stage (P = 0.048). The PD-L2-positive patients had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.018) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.016). Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity were independent predictors of OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of the PD-L1-negative patients, PD-L2 positivity was significantly associated with shorter DFS (P = 0.018). Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the clinical characteristics of patients with PD-L1 expression may differ from those of patients with PD-L2 expression, and that both might contribute to poor prognoses. The potential role of PD-L2 expression as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy should be investigated in future studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062526540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062526540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-019-07231-z
DO - 10.1245/s10434-019-07231-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 30815801
AN - SCOPUS:85062526540
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 26
SP - 1916
EP - 1924
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -