PROMIS physical function underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Michael C. Fu, Brenda Chang, Alexandra C. Wong, Benedict U. Nwachukwu, Russell F. Warren, David M. Dines, Joshua S. Dines, Frank A. Cordasco, Leonard Lyman Stephen, Lawrence V. Gulotta

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

抄録

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function computer adaptive test (PF-CAT) relative to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Methods: A retrospective study of an institutional TSA registry was performed. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT and ASES scores were collected. Floor and ceiling effects were determined, and convergent validity was established through Pearson correlations. Rasch partial credit modeling was used for psychometric analysis of the validity of PF-CAT and ASES question items. Person-item maps were generated to characterize the distribution of question responses along the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Results: Responses from 179 patients (184 shoulders) were included. PF-CAT had a moderate correlation to ASES (r = 0.487; P <.001), with no floor or ceiling effects; ASES had a 1.1% floor effect and no ceiling effect. With iterative Rasch model item-reduction analysis eliminating poorly fitting question items, all possible PF-CAT items were eliminated after 6 iterations. With ASES, just 1 function question item was dropped. Person-item maps showed ASES to be superior to PROMIS PF-CAT psychometrically, with sequential and improved coverage of the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Conclusion: Despite moderate correlation with ASES, PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated inferior validity and psychometric properties in patients undergoing TSA. PF-CAT should not replace the ASES in this population of patients.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)1809-1815
ページ数7
ジャーナルJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
28
発行部数9
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 9 1 2019

Fingerprint

Elbow
Information Systems
Arthroplasty
Psychometrics
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Surgeons
Osteoarthritis
Registries
Retrospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

これを引用

PROMIS physical function underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. / Fu, Michael C.; Chang, Brenda; Wong, Alexandra C.; Nwachukwu, Benedict U.; Warren, Russell F.; Dines, David M.; Dines, Joshua S.; Cordasco, Frank A.; Lyman Stephen, Leonard; Gulotta, Lawrence V.

:: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 巻 28, 番号 9, 01.09.2019, p. 1809-1815.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

Fu, Michael C. ; Chang, Brenda ; Wong, Alexandra C. ; Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ; Warren, Russell F. ; Dines, David M. ; Dines, Joshua S. ; Cordasco, Frank A. ; Lyman Stephen, Leonard ; Gulotta, Lawrence V. / PROMIS physical function underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. :: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019 ; 巻 28, 番号 9. pp. 1809-1815.
@article{cf6ed0bdbc3a4fd2b903760fbe408d77,
title = "PROMIS physical function underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function computer adaptive test (PF-CAT) relative to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Methods: A retrospective study of an institutional TSA registry was performed. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT and ASES scores were collected. Floor and ceiling effects were determined, and convergent validity was established through Pearson correlations. Rasch partial credit modeling was used for psychometric analysis of the validity of PF-CAT and ASES question items. Person-item maps were generated to characterize the distribution of question responses along the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Results: Responses from 179 patients (184 shoulders) were included. PF-CAT had a moderate correlation to ASES (r = 0.487; P <.001), with no floor or ceiling effects; ASES had a 1.1{\%} floor effect and no ceiling effect. With iterative Rasch model item-reduction analysis eliminating poorly fitting question items, all possible PF-CAT items were eliminated after 6 iterations. With ASES, just 1 function question item was dropped. Person-item maps showed ASES to be superior to PROMIS PF-CAT psychometrically, with sequential and improved coverage of the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Conclusion: Despite moderate correlation with ASES, PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated inferior validity and psychometric properties in patients undergoing TSA. PF-CAT should not replace the ASES in this population of patients.",
author = "Fu, {Michael C.} and Brenda Chang and Wong, {Alexandra C.} and Nwachukwu, {Benedict U.} and Warren, {Russell F.} and Dines, {David M.} and Dines, {Joshua S.} and Cordasco, {Frank A.} and {Lyman Stephen}, Leonard and Gulotta, {Lawrence V.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.011",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1809--1815",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PROMIS physical function underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

AU - Fu, Michael C.

AU - Chang, Brenda

AU - Wong, Alexandra C.

AU - Nwachukwu, Benedict U.

AU - Warren, Russell F.

AU - Dines, David M.

AU - Dines, Joshua S.

AU - Cordasco, Frank A.

AU - Lyman Stephen, Leonard

AU - Gulotta, Lawrence V.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function computer adaptive test (PF-CAT) relative to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Methods: A retrospective study of an institutional TSA registry was performed. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT and ASES scores were collected. Floor and ceiling effects were determined, and convergent validity was established through Pearson correlations. Rasch partial credit modeling was used for psychometric analysis of the validity of PF-CAT and ASES question items. Person-item maps were generated to characterize the distribution of question responses along the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Results: Responses from 179 patients (184 shoulders) were included. PF-CAT had a moderate correlation to ASES (r = 0.487; P <.001), with no floor or ceiling effects; ASES had a 1.1% floor effect and no ceiling effect. With iterative Rasch model item-reduction analysis eliminating poorly fitting question items, all possible PF-CAT items were eliminated after 6 iterations. With ASES, just 1 function question item was dropped. Person-item maps showed ASES to be superior to PROMIS PF-CAT psychometrically, with sequential and improved coverage of the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Conclusion: Despite moderate correlation with ASES, PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated inferior validity and psychometric properties in patients undergoing TSA. PF-CAT should not replace the ASES in this population of patients.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function computer adaptive test (PF-CAT) relative to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Methods: A retrospective study of an institutional TSA registry was performed. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT and ASES scores were collected. Floor and ceiling effects were determined, and convergent validity was established through Pearson correlations. Rasch partial credit modeling was used for psychometric analysis of the validity of PF-CAT and ASES question items. Person-item maps were generated to characterize the distribution of question responses along the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Results: Responses from 179 patients (184 shoulders) were included. PF-CAT had a moderate correlation to ASES (r = 0.487; P <.001), with no floor or ceiling effects; ASES had a 1.1% floor effect and no ceiling effect. With iterative Rasch model item-reduction analysis eliminating poorly fitting question items, all possible PF-CAT items were eliminated after 6 iterations. With ASES, just 1 function question item was dropped. Person-item maps showed ASES to be superior to PROMIS PF-CAT psychometrically, with sequential and improved coverage of the latent dimension of shoulder disability. Conclusion: Despite moderate correlation with ASES, PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated inferior validity and psychometric properties in patients undergoing TSA. PF-CAT should not replace the ASES in this population of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064464061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064464061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.011

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1809

EP - 1815

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 9

ER -