TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective study of adoptive activated αβT lymphocyte immunotherapy for refractory cancers
T2 - development and validation of a response scoring system
AU - Nonami, Atsushi
AU - Matsuo, Ryu
AU - Funakoshi, Kouta
AU - Nakayama, Tomohiro
AU - Goto, Shigenori
AU - Iino, Tadafumi
AU - Takaishi, Shigeo
AU - Mizuno, Shinichi
AU - Akashi, Koichi
AU - Eto, Masatoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
Cell culture and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis were partly supported by Medinet Co, Tokyo, Japan. Medinet Co had no involvement in the analysis or interpretation of the data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background aims: This prospective clinical study aimed to determine the efficacy and prognostic factors of adoptive activated αβT lymphocyte immunotherapy for various refractory cancers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was radiological response. Methods: The authors treated 96 patients. Activated αβT lymphocytes were infused every 2 weeks for a total of six times. Prognostic factors were identified by analyzing clinical and laboratory data obtained before therapy. Results: Median survival time (MST) was 150 days (95% confidence interval, 105–191), and approximately 20% of patients achieved disease control (complete response + partial response + stable disease). According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with Akaike information criterion–best subset selection, sex, concurrent therapy, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, CD4:CD8 ratio and T helper (Th)1:Th2 ratio were strong prognostic factors. Using parameter estimates of the Cox analysis, the authors developed a response scoring system. The authors then determined the threshold of the response score between responders and non-responders. This threshold was able to significantly differentiate OS of responders from that of non-responders. MST of responders was longer than that of non-responders (317.5 days versus 74 days). The validity of this response scoring system was then confirmed by internal validation. Conclusions: Adoptive activated αβT lymphocyte immunotherapy has clinical efficacy in certain patients. The authors’ scoring system is the first prognostic model reported for this therapy, and it is useful for selecting patients who might obtain a better prognosis through this modality.
AB - Background aims: This prospective clinical study aimed to determine the efficacy and prognostic factors of adoptive activated αβT lymphocyte immunotherapy for various refractory cancers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was radiological response. Methods: The authors treated 96 patients. Activated αβT lymphocytes were infused every 2 weeks for a total of six times. Prognostic factors were identified by analyzing clinical and laboratory data obtained before therapy. Results: Median survival time (MST) was 150 days (95% confidence interval, 105–191), and approximately 20% of patients achieved disease control (complete response + partial response + stable disease). According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with Akaike information criterion–best subset selection, sex, concurrent therapy, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, CD4:CD8 ratio and T helper (Th)1:Th2 ratio were strong prognostic factors. Using parameter estimates of the Cox analysis, the authors developed a response scoring system. The authors then determined the threshold of the response score between responders and non-responders. This threshold was able to significantly differentiate OS of responders from that of non-responders. MST of responders was longer than that of non-responders (317.5 days versus 74 days). The validity of this response scoring system was then confirmed by internal validation. Conclusions: Adoptive activated αβT lymphocyte immunotherapy has clinical efficacy in certain patients. The authors’ scoring system is the first prognostic model reported for this therapy, and it is useful for selecting patients who might obtain a better prognosis through this modality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140219580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140219580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.09.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.09.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 36253253
AN - SCOPUS:85140219580
SN - 1465-3249
JO - Cytotherapy
JF - Cytotherapy
ER -