Real-World Outcomes of Rivaroxaban Treatment in Patients with Both Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Ischemic Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack

Kazuo Minematsu, Takanori Ikeda, Satoshi Ogawa, Takanari Kitazono, Jyoji Nakagawara, Susumu Miyamoto, Yuji Murakawa, Makiko Takeichi, Yoko Kidani, Yutaka Okayama, Toshiyuki Sunaya, Shoichiro Sato, Satoshi Yamanaka

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事


Introduction: Prior stroke is a risk factor for stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although rivaroxaban is widely prescribed to reduce their risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF), the real-world evidence on rivaroxaban treatment is limited. We aimed to examine the outcomes of rivaroxaban treatment in NVAF patients with prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) by using the data of the Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese-Patients with AF, a prospective, single-arm, observational study. Methods: The clinical outcomes of 9,578 patients who completed the 1-year follow-up were evaluated. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were compared between patients with and without prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Results: Among the patients, 2,153 (22.5%) had prior ischemic stroke/TIA. They were significantly older and had lower body weight, lower creatinine clearance, higher CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and modified HAS-BLED scores as compared to those without prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Any bleeding (9.1 vs. 7.2 events per 100 patient-years), major bleeding (2.3 vs. 1.6 events per 100 patient-years), and stroke/non-central nervous system systemic embolism/myocardial infarction (3.4 vs. 1.3 events per 100 patient-years) were more frequent in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Stepwise regression analysis suggested that body weight of ≤50 kg and diabetes mellitus were predictive of major bleeding in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Conclusions: Safety and effectiveness event rates were higher in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA than those without. This might be explained by differences in several risk profiles including age, body weight, renal function, and risk scores such as CHADS2 between the groups. NCT01582737.

ジャーナルCerebrovascular Diseases
出版物ステータス出版済み - 11 1 2019


All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine