Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy

Anne H. Leitzes, Hollis G. Potter, Terry Amaral, Robert G. Marx, Stephen Lyman, Roger F. Widmann

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

30 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

The purpose of this study was to compare MRI scanogram with traditional radiographic methods for measurement of limb length. The authors hypothesized that MRI scanogram would be as reliable and accurate as radiographic scanogram in measurement of limb length without exposing patients to ionizing radiation. Twelve cadaveric femurs were measured using AP conventional radiographic scanogram, CT scanogram, MRI scanogram, and electronic caliper. Three orthopaedists performed two separate measurements using each technique. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed for each of the three radiographic techniques. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of radiographic measurements to electronic caliper measurements of femur length. The reliability of all three radiographic limb length measurement techniques was excellent (ICC > 0.99). The accuracy of plain radiographic scanogram was slightly superior to CT scanogram and MRI scanogram. The mean absolute differences for radiographic, CT, and MRI scanograms compared with the gold standard, direct caliper measurement, were 0.52 mm, 0.68 mm, and 2.90 mm, respectively. All three scanogram techniques showed excellent reliability and accuracy. Radiographic scanogram remains the gold standard for leg length measurement. MRI scanogram is slightly less accurate compared with radiographic scanogram, but it does not use ionizing radiation. MRI scanogram merits clinical study and comparison with the traditional radiographic scanogram method for measurement of limb length.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)747-749
ページ数3
ジャーナルJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
25
発行部数6
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 11 1 2005

Fingerprint

Extremities
Ionizing Radiation
Femur
Observer Variation
Leg

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

これを引用

Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. / Leitzes, Anne H.; Potter, Hollis G.; Amaral, Terry; Marx, Robert G.; Lyman, Stephen; Widmann, Roger F.

:: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 巻 25, 番号 6, 01.11.2005, p. 747-749.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

Leitzes, Anne H. ; Potter, Hollis G. ; Amaral, Terry ; Marx, Robert G. ; Lyman, Stephen ; Widmann, Roger F. / Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. :: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2005 ; 巻 25, 番号 6. pp. 747-749.
@article{06d54919c36e4da493a1a0d0875617aa,
title = "Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare MRI scanogram with traditional radiographic methods for measurement of limb length. The authors hypothesized that MRI scanogram would be as reliable and accurate as radiographic scanogram in measurement of limb length without exposing patients to ionizing radiation. Twelve cadaveric femurs were measured using AP conventional radiographic scanogram, CT scanogram, MRI scanogram, and electronic caliper. Three orthopaedists performed two separate measurements using each technique. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed for each of the three radiographic techniques. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of radiographic measurements to electronic caliper measurements of femur length. The reliability of all three radiographic limb length measurement techniques was excellent (ICC > 0.99). The accuracy of plain radiographic scanogram was slightly superior to CT scanogram and MRI scanogram. The mean absolute differences for radiographic, CT, and MRI scanograms compared with the gold standard, direct caliper measurement, were 0.52 mm, 0.68 mm, and 2.90 mm, respectively. All three scanogram techniques showed excellent reliability and accuracy. Radiographic scanogram remains the gold standard for leg length measurement. MRI scanogram is slightly less accurate compared with radiographic scanogram, but it does not use ionizing radiation. MRI scanogram merits clinical study and comparison with the traditional radiographic scanogram method for measurement of limb length.",
author = "Leitzes, {Anne H.} and Potter, {Hollis G.} and Terry Amaral and Marx, {Robert G.} and Stephen Lyman and Widmann, {Roger F.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.bpo.0000173246.12184.a5",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "747--749",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",
issn = "0271-6798",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy

AU - Leitzes, Anne H.

AU - Potter, Hollis G.

AU - Amaral, Terry

AU - Marx, Robert G.

AU - Lyman, Stephen

AU - Widmann, Roger F.

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare MRI scanogram with traditional radiographic methods for measurement of limb length. The authors hypothesized that MRI scanogram would be as reliable and accurate as radiographic scanogram in measurement of limb length without exposing patients to ionizing radiation. Twelve cadaveric femurs were measured using AP conventional radiographic scanogram, CT scanogram, MRI scanogram, and electronic caliper. Three orthopaedists performed two separate measurements using each technique. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed for each of the three radiographic techniques. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of radiographic measurements to electronic caliper measurements of femur length. The reliability of all three radiographic limb length measurement techniques was excellent (ICC > 0.99). The accuracy of plain radiographic scanogram was slightly superior to CT scanogram and MRI scanogram. The mean absolute differences for radiographic, CT, and MRI scanograms compared with the gold standard, direct caliper measurement, were 0.52 mm, 0.68 mm, and 2.90 mm, respectively. All three scanogram techniques showed excellent reliability and accuracy. Radiographic scanogram remains the gold standard for leg length measurement. MRI scanogram is slightly less accurate compared with radiographic scanogram, but it does not use ionizing radiation. MRI scanogram merits clinical study and comparison with the traditional radiographic scanogram method for measurement of limb length.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare MRI scanogram with traditional radiographic methods for measurement of limb length. The authors hypothesized that MRI scanogram would be as reliable and accurate as radiographic scanogram in measurement of limb length without exposing patients to ionizing radiation. Twelve cadaveric femurs were measured using AP conventional radiographic scanogram, CT scanogram, MRI scanogram, and electronic caliper. Three orthopaedists performed two separate measurements using each technique. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed for each of the three radiographic techniques. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of radiographic measurements to electronic caliper measurements of femur length. The reliability of all three radiographic limb length measurement techniques was excellent (ICC > 0.99). The accuracy of plain radiographic scanogram was slightly superior to CT scanogram and MRI scanogram. The mean absolute differences for radiographic, CT, and MRI scanograms compared with the gold standard, direct caliper measurement, were 0.52 mm, 0.68 mm, and 2.90 mm, respectively. All three scanogram techniques showed excellent reliability and accuracy. Radiographic scanogram remains the gold standard for leg length measurement. MRI scanogram is slightly less accurate compared with radiographic scanogram, but it does not use ionizing radiation. MRI scanogram merits clinical study and comparison with the traditional radiographic scanogram method for measurement of limb length.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27544511425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27544511425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.bpo.0000173246.12184.a5

DO - 10.1097/01.bpo.0000173246.12184.a5

M3 - Article

C2 - 16294130

AN - SCOPUS:27544511425

VL - 25

SP - 747

EP - 749

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

SN - 0271-6798

IS - 6

ER -