Single-stage hybrid total arch replacement for extended arch aneurysms

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

抄録

Objective: The therapeutic strategy for extended aortic arch aneurysms remains controversial and has changed substantially since thoracic endovascular aortic repair was introduced. We applied single-stage hybrid (s-hybrid) total arch replacement (TAR), which involved ascending aorta replacement and debranching of arch vessels, consecutively performed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for extended arch aneurysms. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term results of s-hybrid TAR and to clarify the benefit of this method. Methods: We reviewed the operative results of 62 patients who underwent elective s-hybrid TAR or conventional TAR (c-TAR) through the median approach from 2008 to 2017. We used the s-hybrid approach in 15 patients and the c-TAR approach in 47 patients. In both groups, axillary arterial perfusion and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia were applied for brain protection. We compared the perioperative outcomes of the two groups. Results: We completed s-hybrid TAR in all 15 patients with extended aneurysms. The s-hybrid group required shorter times for myocardial ischemia, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, and circulatory arrest of the lower body compared with the c-TAR group. The patients with complicated recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and long ventilation support times were fewer in the s-hybrid group. No patient had substantial endoleaks or permanent paraplegia. The in-hospital mortality rates were 6.7% in the s-hybrid group and 0% in the c-TAR group. Conclusions: The s-hybrid TAR has the same or better perioperative outcomes compared with the c-TAR approach. For extended aneurysms, this technique could resolve the problem of respiratory failure induced by left thoracotomy and also resolve the problem of rupture during the waiting period in staged surgery.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)1719-1725
ページ数7
ジャーナルJournal of Vascular Surgery
69
発行部数6
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 6 1 2019

Fingerprint

Aneurysm
Perfusion
Thorax
Endoleak
Vocal Cord Paralysis
Aortic Aneurysm
Paraplegia
Thoracotomy
Hospital Mortality
Hypothermia
Thoracic Aorta
Respiratory Insufficiency
Myocardial Ischemia
Ventilation
Aorta
Rupture
Mortality
Brain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

これを引用

@article{ba7d7210e4844715b086f9be7cb2efba,
title = "Single-stage hybrid total arch replacement for extended arch aneurysms",
abstract = "Objective: The therapeutic strategy for extended aortic arch aneurysms remains controversial and has changed substantially since thoracic endovascular aortic repair was introduced. We applied single-stage hybrid (s-hybrid) total arch replacement (TAR), which involved ascending aorta replacement and debranching of arch vessels, consecutively performed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for extended arch aneurysms. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term results of s-hybrid TAR and to clarify the benefit of this method. Methods: We reviewed the operative results of 62 patients who underwent elective s-hybrid TAR or conventional TAR (c-TAR) through the median approach from 2008 to 2017. We used the s-hybrid approach in 15 patients and the c-TAR approach in 47 patients. In both groups, axillary arterial perfusion and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia were applied for brain protection. We compared the perioperative outcomes of the two groups. Results: We completed s-hybrid TAR in all 15 patients with extended aneurysms. The s-hybrid group required shorter times for myocardial ischemia, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, and circulatory arrest of the lower body compared with the c-TAR group. The patients with complicated recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and long ventilation support times were fewer in the s-hybrid group. No patient had substantial endoleaks or permanent paraplegia. The in-hospital mortality rates were 6.7{\%} in the s-hybrid group and 0{\%} in the c-TAR group. Conclusions: The s-hybrid TAR has the same or better perioperative outcomes compared with the c-TAR approach. For extended aneurysms, this technique could resolve the problem of respiratory failure induced by left thoracotomy and also resolve the problem of rupture during the waiting period in staged surgery.",
author = "Yasuhisa Oishi and Hiromichi Sonoda and Tomoki Ushijima and Satoshi Kimura and Hideki Tatewaki and Yoshihisa Tanoue and Akira Shiose",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.184",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "1719--1725",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-stage hybrid total arch replacement for extended arch aneurysms

AU - Oishi, Yasuhisa

AU - Sonoda, Hiromichi

AU - Ushijima, Tomoki

AU - Kimura, Satoshi

AU - Tatewaki, Hideki

AU - Tanoue, Yoshihisa

AU - Shiose, Akira

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Objective: The therapeutic strategy for extended aortic arch aneurysms remains controversial and has changed substantially since thoracic endovascular aortic repair was introduced. We applied single-stage hybrid (s-hybrid) total arch replacement (TAR), which involved ascending aorta replacement and debranching of arch vessels, consecutively performed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for extended arch aneurysms. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term results of s-hybrid TAR and to clarify the benefit of this method. Methods: We reviewed the operative results of 62 patients who underwent elective s-hybrid TAR or conventional TAR (c-TAR) through the median approach from 2008 to 2017. We used the s-hybrid approach in 15 patients and the c-TAR approach in 47 patients. In both groups, axillary arterial perfusion and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia were applied for brain protection. We compared the perioperative outcomes of the two groups. Results: We completed s-hybrid TAR in all 15 patients with extended aneurysms. The s-hybrid group required shorter times for myocardial ischemia, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, and circulatory arrest of the lower body compared with the c-TAR group. The patients with complicated recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and long ventilation support times were fewer in the s-hybrid group. No patient had substantial endoleaks or permanent paraplegia. The in-hospital mortality rates were 6.7% in the s-hybrid group and 0% in the c-TAR group. Conclusions: The s-hybrid TAR has the same or better perioperative outcomes compared with the c-TAR approach. For extended aneurysms, this technique could resolve the problem of respiratory failure induced by left thoracotomy and also resolve the problem of rupture during the waiting period in staged surgery.

AB - Objective: The therapeutic strategy for extended aortic arch aneurysms remains controversial and has changed substantially since thoracic endovascular aortic repair was introduced. We applied single-stage hybrid (s-hybrid) total arch replacement (TAR), which involved ascending aorta replacement and debranching of arch vessels, consecutively performed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for extended arch aneurysms. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term results of s-hybrid TAR and to clarify the benefit of this method. Methods: We reviewed the operative results of 62 patients who underwent elective s-hybrid TAR or conventional TAR (c-TAR) through the median approach from 2008 to 2017. We used the s-hybrid approach in 15 patients and the c-TAR approach in 47 patients. In both groups, axillary arterial perfusion and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia were applied for brain protection. We compared the perioperative outcomes of the two groups. Results: We completed s-hybrid TAR in all 15 patients with extended aneurysms. The s-hybrid group required shorter times for myocardial ischemia, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, and circulatory arrest of the lower body compared with the c-TAR group. The patients with complicated recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and long ventilation support times were fewer in the s-hybrid group. No patient had substantial endoleaks or permanent paraplegia. The in-hospital mortality rates were 6.7% in the s-hybrid group and 0% in the c-TAR group. Conclusions: The s-hybrid TAR has the same or better perioperative outcomes compared with the c-TAR approach. For extended aneurysms, this technique could resolve the problem of respiratory failure induced by left thoracotomy and also resolve the problem of rupture during the waiting period in staged surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065844288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065844288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.184

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.184

M3 - Article

C2 - 31159980

AN - SCOPUS:85065844288

VL - 69

SP - 1719

EP - 1725

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -