TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical reconstruction and endoscopic pancreatic stent for traumatic pancreatic duct disruption
AU - Kawahara, Insu
AU - Maeda, Kosaku
AU - Ono, Shigeru
AU - Kawashima, Hiroshi
AU - Deie, Ryoichi
AU - Yanagisawa, Satohiko
AU - Baba, Katsuhisa
AU - Usui, Yoshiko
AU - Tsuji, Yuki
AU - Fukuta, Atsuhisa
AU - Sekine, Sachi
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Nonoperative management is acceptable treatment for minor pancreatic injuries. However, management of major pancreatic duct injury in children remains controversial. We present our experience in treating isolated pancreatic duct injury. We describe the cases of three male patients treated for complete pancreatic duct disruption in the past 5 years at our institution. We performed pancreatic duct repair to avoid distal pancreatectomy and to maintain normal pancreatic function. All patients underwent enhanced computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the early period. The injuries were classified as grade III according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification. In two cases, we performed end-to-end anastomosis of the pancreatic duct during the delayed period. In the third case, we placed a stent across the disruption to the distal pancreatic duct. The patients' postoperative courses were uneventful, and the average hospitalization was 25.6 days after the procedure. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 14-54 months), all patients remain asymptomatic, with normal pancreatic function, but with persistent distal pancreatic duct dilatation. We suggest that distal pancreatectomy should not be routinely performed in patients with isolated pancreatic duct injury.
AB - Nonoperative management is acceptable treatment for minor pancreatic injuries. However, management of major pancreatic duct injury in children remains controversial. We present our experience in treating isolated pancreatic duct injury. We describe the cases of three male patients treated for complete pancreatic duct disruption in the past 5 years at our institution. We performed pancreatic duct repair to avoid distal pancreatectomy and to maintain normal pancreatic function. All patients underwent enhanced computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the early period. The injuries were classified as grade III according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification. In two cases, we performed end-to-end anastomosis of the pancreatic duct during the delayed period. In the third case, we placed a stent across the disruption to the distal pancreatic duct. The patients' postoperative courses were uneventful, and the average hospitalization was 25.6 days after the procedure. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 14-54 months), all patients remain asymptomatic, with normal pancreatic function, but with persistent distal pancreatic duct dilatation. We suggest that distal pancreatectomy should not be routinely performed in patients with isolated pancreatic duct injury.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908356670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908356670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00383-014-3570-2
DO - 10.1007/s00383-014-3570-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 25070690
AN - SCOPUS:84908356670
VL - 30
SP - 951
EP - 956
JO - Pediatric Surgery International
JF - Pediatric Surgery International
SN - 0179-0358
IS - 9
ER -