Technical and environmental efficiency of eco-friendly rice production in the upstream region of the Vietnamese Mekong delta

Vo Hong Tu, Nguyen Duy Can, Yoshifumi Takahashi, Steven W. Kopp, Mitsuyasu Yabe

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

抄録

Although public policy makers, farmers, and agricultural experts have invested considerable efforts to promote environmentally friendly rice production methods, the adoption of these practices is quite low in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. One explanation for this is an underestimation of the environmental and economic values of these practices. The present study aimed at estimating environmental and technical efficiencies for all methods of rice production and then comparing each method in terms of efficiencies and economic benefits. Survey data included responses from farmers who used either eco-friendly or conventional rice cultivation methods. Latent class stochastic frontier analysis shows that the average technical efficiency across all methods was 85.02% and environmental efficiency across all methods was 22.58%. Among individual methods, floating rice had the highest technical and environmental efficiency scores. Ecologically engineered rice had the lowest economic and environmental performance. The average environmental efficiency of conventional rice production was 16.25%, which is significantly higher than that of ecologically engineered rice, large-scale rice, and GlobalGAP rice. The results indicate considerable overuse of agrochemical inputs and also point to other specific factors of production that influence these efficiencies. Several public policy and agricultural management recommendations are derived from the study.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)2401-2424
ページ数24
ジャーナルEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
21
発行部数5
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 10 1 2019

Fingerprint

rice
efficiency
technical efficiency
farmer
public policy
production method
economics
economic value
floating
Eco-friendly
Rice production
Technical efficiency
Environmental efficiency
agricultural management
agrochemical
expert
method
management
performance
Public policy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

これを引用

Technical and environmental efficiency of eco-friendly rice production in the upstream region of the Vietnamese Mekong delta. / Tu, Vo Hong; Can, Nguyen Duy; Takahashi, Yoshifumi; Kopp, Steven W.; Yabe, Mitsuyasu.

:: Environment, Development and Sustainability, 巻 21, 番号 5, 01.10.2019, p. 2401-2424.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

@article{95d09cd67f524829acbcf88ab61b2ebb,
title = "Technical and environmental efficiency of eco-friendly rice production in the upstream region of the Vietnamese Mekong delta",
abstract = "Although public policy makers, farmers, and agricultural experts have invested considerable efforts to promote environmentally friendly rice production methods, the adoption of these practices is quite low in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. One explanation for this is an underestimation of the environmental and economic values of these practices. The present study aimed at estimating environmental and technical efficiencies for all methods of rice production and then comparing each method in terms of efficiencies and economic benefits. Survey data included responses from farmers who used either eco-friendly or conventional rice cultivation methods. Latent class stochastic frontier analysis shows that the average technical efficiency across all methods was 85.02{\%} and environmental efficiency across all methods was 22.58{\%}. Among individual methods, floating rice had the highest technical and environmental efficiency scores. Ecologically engineered rice had the lowest economic and environmental performance. The average environmental efficiency of conventional rice production was 16.25{\%}, which is significantly higher than that of ecologically engineered rice, large-scale rice, and GlobalGAP rice. The results indicate considerable overuse of agrochemical inputs and also point to other specific factors of production that influence these efficiencies. Several public policy and agricultural management recommendations are derived from the study.",
author = "Tu, {Vo Hong} and Can, {Nguyen Duy} and Yoshifumi Takahashi and Kopp, {Steven W.} and Mitsuyasu Yabe",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10668-018-0140-0",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "2401--2424",
journal = "Environment, Development and Sustainability",
issn = "1387-585X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technical and environmental efficiency of eco-friendly rice production in the upstream region of the Vietnamese Mekong delta

AU - Tu, Vo Hong

AU - Can, Nguyen Duy

AU - Takahashi, Yoshifumi

AU - Kopp, Steven W.

AU - Yabe, Mitsuyasu

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Although public policy makers, farmers, and agricultural experts have invested considerable efforts to promote environmentally friendly rice production methods, the adoption of these practices is quite low in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. One explanation for this is an underestimation of the environmental and economic values of these practices. The present study aimed at estimating environmental and technical efficiencies for all methods of rice production and then comparing each method in terms of efficiencies and economic benefits. Survey data included responses from farmers who used either eco-friendly or conventional rice cultivation methods. Latent class stochastic frontier analysis shows that the average technical efficiency across all methods was 85.02% and environmental efficiency across all methods was 22.58%. Among individual methods, floating rice had the highest technical and environmental efficiency scores. Ecologically engineered rice had the lowest economic and environmental performance. The average environmental efficiency of conventional rice production was 16.25%, which is significantly higher than that of ecologically engineered rice, large-scale rice, and GlobalGAP rice. The results indicate considerable overuse of agrochemical inputs and also point to other specific factors of production that influence these efficiencies. Several public policy and agricultural management recommendations are derived from the study.

AB - Although public policy makers, farmers, and agricultural experts have invested considerable efforts to promote environmentally friendly rice production methods, the adoption of these practices is quite low in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. One explanation for this is an underestimation of the environmental and economic values of these practices. The present study aimed at estimating environmental and technical efficiencies for all methods of rice production and then comparing each method in terms of efficiencies and economic benefits. Survey data included responses from farmers who used either eco-friendly or conventional rice cultivation methods. Latent class stochastic frontier analysis shows that the average technical efficiency across all methods was 85.02% and environmental efficiency across all methods was 22.58%. Among individual methods, floating rice had the highest technical and environmental efficiency scores. Ecologically engineered rice had the lowest economic and environmental performance. The average environmental efficiency of conventional rice production was 16.25%, which is significantly higher than that of ecologically engineered rice, large-scale rice, and GlobalGAP rice. The results indicate considerable overuse of agrochemical inputs and also point to other specific factors of production that influence these efficiencies. Several public policy and agricultural management recommendations are derived from the study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044729844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044729844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10668-018-0140-0

DO - 10.1007/s10668-018-0140-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044729844

VL - 21

SP - 2401

EP - 2424

JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability

JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability

SN - 1387-585X

IS - 5

ER -