Tenofovir Versus Entecavir for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention in an International Consortium of Chronic Hepatitis B

Yao Chun Hsu, Grace Lai Hung Wong, Chien Hung Chen, Cheng Yuan Peng, Ming Lun Yeh, Ka Shing Cheung, Hidenori Toyoda, Chung Feng Huang, Huy Trinh, Qing Xie, Masaru Enomoto, Li Liu, Satoshi Yasuda, Yasuhito Tanaka, Ritsuzo Kozuka, Pei Chien Tsai, Yen Tsung Huang, Christopher Wong, Rui Huang, Tyng Yuan JangJoseph Hoang, Hwai I. Yang, Jiayi Li, Dong Hyun Lee, Hirokazu Takahashi, Jian Q. Zhang, Eiichi Ogawa, Changqing Zhao, Chenghai Liu, Norihiro Furusyo, Yuichiro Eguchi, Clifford Wong, Chao Wu, Takashi Kumada, Man Fung Yuen, Ming Lung Yu, Mindie H. Nguyen

研究成果: Contribution to journalArticle査読

30 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differ in their effectiveness for preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed an international consortium that encompassed 19 centers from 6 countries or regions composed of previously untreated CHB patients then treated with either ETV or TDF monotherapy. Those who developed HCC before antiviral treatment or within 1 year of therapy were excluded. The association between antiviral regimen and HCC risk was evaluated using competing-risk survival regression. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) to 1:1 balance the 2 treatment cohorts. A total of 5,537 patients were eligible (n = 4,837 received ETV and n = 700 received TDF) and observed for HCC occurrence until December 23, 2018. Before PSM, the TDF cohort was significantly younger and had generally less advanced diseases. RESULTS: In the unadjusted analysis, TDF was associated with a lower risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.79; P = 0.005). The multivariable analysis, however, found that the association between TDF and HCC no longer existed (SHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.56; P = 0.52) after adjustment for age, sex, country, albumin, platelet, α-fetoprotein, cirrhosis, and diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the PSM analysis (n = 1,040) found no between-cohort differences in HCC incidences (P = 0.51) and no association between regimens (TDF or ETV) and HCC risk in the multivariable-adjusted analysis (adjusted SHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.92; P = 0.77). DISCUSSION: TDF and ETV did not significantly differ in the prevention of HCC in patients with CHB.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)271-280
ページ数10
ジャーナルThe American journal of gastroenterology
115
2
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2 1 2020
外部発表はい

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • 肝臓学
  • 消化器病学

フィンガープリント

「Tenofovir Versus Entecavir for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention in an International Consortium of Chronic Hepatitis B」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル