TY - JOUR
T1 - The Association of Sedentary Behaviour and Cognitive Function in People Without Dementia
T2 - A Coordinated Analysis Across Five Cohort Studies from COSMIC
AU - COSMIC Collaborators
AU - Maasakkers, Carlijn M.
AU - Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R.
AU - Gardiner, Paul A.
AU - Olde Rikkert, Marcel G.M.
AU - Lipnicki, Darren M.
AU - Scarmeas, Nikolaos
AU - Dardiotis, Efthimios
AU - Yannakoulia, Mary
AU - Anstey, Kaarin J.
AU - Cherbuin, Nicolas
AU - Haan, Mary N.
AU - Kumagai, Shuzo
AU - Narazaki, Kenji
AU - Chen, Tao
AU - Ng, Tze Pin
AU - Gao, Qi
AU - Nyunt, Ma S.Z.
AU - Crawford, John D.
AU - Kochan, Nicole A.
AU - Makkar, Steve R.
AU - Sachdev, Perminder S.
AU - Thijssen, Dick H.J.
AU - Melis, René J.F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and Australian Research Council https://nhmrc.gov.au/ (Dementia Research Development Fellowship #110331 to PG). Funding for COSMIC comes from a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia https://nhmrc.gov.au/ Program Grant (ID 1093083), the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health https://www.nia.nih.gov/ under Award Number RF1AG057531, and philanthropic contributions to The Dementia Momentum Fund https://cheba.unsw.edu.au/the-dementia-momentum (UNSW Project ID PS38235).The HELIAD study was supported by an Alzheimer’s Association https://www.alz.org/ , Grant/Award Number: IIRG‐09‐133014; an ESPA‐EU program Excellence https://www.espa.gr/ , Grant/Award Number: 189 10276/8/9/2011; an European Social Fund and Greek National resources; Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity http://www.moh.gov.gr/ , Grant/Award Number:ΔΥ2β/οικ.51657/14.4.2009 to NS. The PATH study was funded by supported by NHMRC https://nhmrc.gov.au/ Grant #1002160, and KA is funded by NHMRC https://nhmrc.gov.au/ Fellowship APP1102694. The SALSA study was supported by funds NIH https://www.nih.gov/ , AG12975 and NIEHS https://www.niehs.nih.gov , ES023451 to MH. The SGS study was supported by JSPS www.jsps.go.jp/english/ , KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K09146 to KN. The SLAS2 study was supported by research grants from the Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR) Biomedical Research Council (BMRC) https://www.a-star.edu.sg/ [Grants 03/1/21/17/214 and 08/1/21/19/567] and the National Medical Research Council http://www.nmrc.gov.sg/ [Grant: NMRC/1108/2007] to TN, QG & MN. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or other funders.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Background: Besides physical activity as a target for dementia prevention, sedentary behaviour is hypothesized to be a potential target in its own right. The rising number of persons with dementia and lack of any effective treatment highlight the urgency to better understand these modifiable risk factors. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether higher levels of sedentary behaviour are associated with reduced global cognitive functioning and slower cognitive decline in older persons without dementia. Methods: We used five population cohorts from Greece, Australia, USA, Japan, and Singapore (HELIAD, PATH, SALSA, SGS, and SLAS2) from the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium. In a coordinated analysis, we assessed the relationship between sedentary behaviour and global cognitive function with the use of linear mixed growth model analysis (mean follow-up range of 2.0–8.1 years). Results: Baseline datasets combined 10,450 older adults without dementia with a mean age range between cohorts of 66.7–75.1 years. After adjusting for multiple covariates, no cross-sectional association between sedentary behaviour and cognition was found in four studies. One association was detected where more sedentary behaviour was cross-sectionally linked to higher cognition levels (SLAS2, B = 0.118 (0.075; 0.160), P < 0.001). Longitudinally, there were no associations between baseline sedentary behaviour and cognitive decline (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, these results do not suggest an association between total sedentary time and lower global cognition in older persons without dementia at baseline or over time. We hypothesize that specific types of sedentary behaviour may differentially influence cognition which should be investigated further. For now, it is, however, too early to establish undifferentiated sedentary time as a potential effective target for minimizing cognitive decline in older adults without dementia.
AB - Background: Besides physical activity as a target for dementia prevention, sedentary behaviour is hypothesized to be a potential target in its own right. The rising number of persons with dementia and lack of any effective treatment highlight the urgency to better understand these modifiable risk factors. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether higher levels of sedentary behaviour are associated with reduced global cognitive functioning and slower cognitive decline in older persons without dementia. Methods: We used five population cohorts from Greece, Australia, USA, Japan, and Singapore (HELIAD, PATH, SALSA, SGS, and SLAS2) from the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium. In a coordinated analysis, we assessed the relationship between sedentary behaviour and global cognitive function with the use of linear mixed growth model analysis (mean follow-up range of 2.0–8.1 years). Results: Baseline datasets combined 10,450 older adults without dementia with a mean age range between cohorts of 66.7–75.1 years. After adjusting for multiple covariates, no cross-sectional association between sedentary behaviour and cognition was found in four studies. One association was detected where more sedentary behaviour was cross-sectionally linked to higher cognition levels (SLAS2, B = 0.118 (0.075; 0.160), P < 0.001). Longitudinally, there were no associations between baseline sedentary behaviour and cognitive decline (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, these results do not suggest an association between total sedentary time and lower global cognition in older persons without dementia at baseline or over time. We hypothesize that specific types of sedentary behaviour may differentially influence cognition which should be investigated further. For now, it is, however, too early to establish undifferentiated sedentary time as a potential effective target for minimizing cognitive decline in older adults without dementia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073813927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073813927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40279-019-01186-7
DO - 10.1007/s40279-019-01186-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 31529300
AN - SCOPUS:85073813927
SN - 0112-1642
VL - 50
SP - 403
EP - 413
JO - Sports Medicine
JF - Sports Medicine
IS - 2
ER -