TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a single-channel airflow monitor for screening of sleep-disordered breathing
AU - Nakano, H.
AU - Tanigawa, T.
AU - Ohnishi, Y.
AU - Uemori, H.
AU - Senzaki, K.
AU - Furukawa, T.
AU - Nishima, S.
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - A simple screening method for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is desirable for primary care practices. In the present study, a simple monitor, which utilises a new type of flow sensor and a novel algorithm, was prospectively validated. Home recording for 2 nights with the monitor only, followed by in-laboratory recording with the monitor together with polysomnography, were carried out in consecutive patients (n=100) suspected of SDB. A subjective sleep log was also recorded. The signal was analysed using power spectral analysis, which yielded the flow respiratory disturbance index (flow-RDI). There was no recording failure at home. The reproducibility of the flow-RDI between the 2 nights at home was high (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.92). The sensitivity and specificity of the in-laboratory flow-RDI to diagnose SDB were 0.96 and 0.82, 0.91 and 0.82, and 0.89 and 0.96, for apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30 events·h-1, respectively. The diagnostic ability in low-severity subgroups (female, normal weight, AHI <15 events·h-1) was almost comparable to that in the entire group. Excluding subjective waking time on the sleep log from the recording time had no significant effect on the flow-RDI. The single-channel monitor is considered feasible for ambulatory sleep disordered breathing monitoring because of its easy applicability, high reproducibility and relatively high agreement with polysomnography results. Copyright
AB - A simple screening method for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is desirable for primary care practices. In the present study, a simple monitor, which utilises a new type of flow sensor and a novel algorithm, was prospectively validated. Home recording for 2 nights with the monitor only, followed by in-laboratory recording with the monitor together with polysomnography, were carried out in consecutive patients (n=100) suspected of SDB. A subjective sleep log was also recorded. The signal was analysed using power spectral analysis, which yielded the flow respiratory disturbance index (flow-RDI). There was no recording failure at home. The reproducibility of the flow-RDI between the 2 nights at home was high (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.92). The sensitivity and specificity of the in-laboratory flow-RDI to diagnose SDB were 0.96 and 0.82, 0.91 and 0.82, and 0.89 and 0.96, for apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30 events·h-1, respectively. The diagnostic ability in low-severity subgroups (female, normal weight, AHI <15 events·h-1) was almost comparable to that in the entire group. Excluding subjective waking time on the sleep log from the recording time had no significant effect on the flow-RDI. The single-channel monitor is considered feasible for ambulatory sleep disordered breathing monitoring because of its easy applicability, high reproducibility and relatively high agreement with polysomnography results. Copyright
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849098679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58849098679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1183/09031936.00130907
DO - 10.1183/09031936.00130907
M3 - Article
C2 - 18480104
AN - SCOPUS:58849098679
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 32
SP - 1060
EP - 1067
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Respiratory Diseases
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Respiratory Diseases
IS - 4
ER -