Who responds more to environmental amenities and dis-amenities?

Darshana Dewage Peiris Rajapaksa Rajapaksa, Clevo Wilson, Viet Ngu Hoang, Boon Lee, Shunsuke Managi

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

8 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

It is hypothesised that different property sub-markets react to flood risk information, floods and environmental factors differently. To test this hypothesis this research uses spatial quantile regression and quasi-experimental techniques to examine property sub-market behaviour in response to availability of flood risk information and actual flood. This new contribution to the literature is based on the use of the mapping of flood risk areas in 2009 and the 2011 flooding of Brisbane, Australia, as a case study. The results show that the impact of flood risk and actual flood on property markets varies between different sub-markets. They therefore confirm the existence of property sub-markets based on property and environmental characteristics and suggest the need for differentiate mitigation policies.

元の言語英語
ページ(範囲)151-158
ページ数8
ジャーナルLand Use Policy
62
DOI
出版物ステータス出版済み - 3 1 2017

Fingerprint

amenity
market
markets
property market
environmental factors
regression
mitigation
environmental factor
flooding
case studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

これを引用

Who responds more to environmental amenities and dis-amenities? / Rajapaksa, Darshana Dewage Peiris Rajapaksa; Wilson, Clevo; Hoang, Viet Ngu; Lee, Boon; Managi, Shunsuke.

:: Land Use Policy, 巻 62, 01.03.2017, p. 151-158.

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事

Rajapaksa, Darshana Dewage Peiris Rajapaksa ; Wilson, Clevo ; Hoang, Viet Ngu ; Lee, Boon ; Managi, Shunsuke. / Who responds more to environmental amenities and dis-amenities?. :: Land Use Policy. 2017 ; 巻 62. pp. 151-158.
@article{1a704afcd40742bdbd3eddb9572175f4,
title = "Who responds more to environmental amenities and dis-amenities?",
abstract = "It is hypothesised that different property sub-markets react to flood risk information, floods and environmental factors differently. To test this hypothesis this research uses spatial quantile regression and quasi-experimental techniques to examine property sub-market behaviour in response to availability of flood risk information and actual flood. This new contribution to the literature is based on the use of the mapping of flood risk areas in 2009 and the 2011 flooding of Brisbane, Australia, as a case study. The results show that the impact of flood risk and actual flood on property markets varies between different sub-markets. They therefore confirm the existence of property sub-markets based on property and environmental characteristics and suggest the need for differentiate mitigation policies.",
author = "Rajapaksa, {Darshana Dewage Peiris Rajapaksa} and Clevo Wilson and Hoang, {Viet Ngu} and Boon Lee and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.029",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "151--158",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who responds more to environmental amenities and dis-amenities?

AU - Rajapaksa, Darshana Dewage Peiris Rajapaksa

AU - Wilson, Clevo

AU - Hoang, Viet Ngu

AU - Lee, Boon

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - It is hypothesised that different property sub-markets react to flood risk information, floods and environmental factors differently. To test this hypothesis this research uses spatial quantile regression and quasi-experimental techniques to examine property sub-market behaviour in response to availability of flood risk information and actual flood. This new contribution to the literature is based on the use of the mapping of flood risk areas in 2009 and the 2011 flooding of Brisbane, Australia, as a case study. The results show that the impact of flood risk and actual flood on property markets varies between different sub-markets. They therefore confirm the existence of property sub-markets based on property and environmental characteristics and suggest the need for differentiate mitigation policies.

AB - It is hypothesised that different property sub-markets react to flood risk information, floods and environmental factors differently. To test this hypothesis this research uses spatial quantile regression and quasi-experimental techniques to examine property sub-market behaviour in response to availability of flood risk information and actual flood. This new contribution to the literature is based on the use of the mapping of flood risk areas in 2009 and the 2011 flooding of Brisbane, Australia, as a case study. The results show that the impact of flood risk and actual flood on property markets varies between different sub-markets. They therefore confirm the existence of property sub-markets based on property and environmental characteristics and suggest the need for differentiate mitigation policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008474439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008474439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.029

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.029

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 151

EP - 158

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -